Soil Data Explorer - WOODSFIELD

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the WOODSFIELD soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of WOODSFIELD, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to WOODSFIELD were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
n/a	AD-s17	1961-OH001-S17	Woodsfield	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	NB-s11	1966-OH121-S11	Woodsfield	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	JF-003	1978-OH081-003	Woodsfield	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	NB-023	1983-OH121-023	Woodsfield	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	NB-047	1984-OH121-047	Woodsfield	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	MO-013	1988-OH115-013	Woodsfield	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the WOODSFIELD soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the WOODSFIELD series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the WOODSFIELD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the WOODSFIELD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with WOODSFIELD share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the WOODSFIELD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the WOODSFIELD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with WOODSFIELD, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. WV-2012-03-23-06 | Pleasants and Tyler Counties - July 1989

   Typical relationship of soils, landscapes, and underlying parent materials in Otwell-Gallia-Hackers general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Pleasants and Tyler Counties, WV; 1989).

Map Units

Map units containing WOODSFIELD as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Woodsfield silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes	WtB	1540	537415	2wdq0	oh009	1981	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes	WtC	1310	537416	2wdq1	oh009	1981	1:15840
Westmoreland-Woodsfield silt loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	WmW1D2	1	2479329	2p6yc	oh013	1978	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes	WoB	498	536857	l0mz	oh053	1988	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes	WtB	427	536969	l0rl	oh059	1998	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes	WtC	420	536970	2wdq1	oh059	1998	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes	WoB	692	536201	2wdq0	oh087	1989	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes	WoB	698	537215	2wdq0	oh105	1991	1:15840
Westmoreland-Woodsfield silt loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	WmW1D2	5970	2452377	2n9wy	oh111	1968	1:15840
Zanesville-Woodsfield silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	ZoC2	5075	537847	2wdq4	oh111	1968	1:15840
Zanesville-Woodsfield silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes	ZoC	537	537846	l1nw	oh111	1968	1:15840
Zanesville-Woodsfield silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes	ZoB	500	537844	l1nt	oh111	1968	1:15840
Zanesville-Woodsfield silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately eroded	ZoB2	407	537845	l1nv	oh111	1968	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes	WtC2	284	537835	2wdq2	oh111	1968	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, moderately eroded	WtD2	167	537836	l1nk	oh111	1968	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes	WtB	129	537834	2wdq0	oh111	1968	1:15840
Woodsfield-Zanesville silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes	WvC	50	1469235	2wdq6	oh111	1968	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes	WuC	35	1469265	2wdq1	oh111	1968	1:15840
Woodsfield-Zanesville silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes	WvB	10	1469234	2wdq5	oh111	1968	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes	WyC2	2236	537478	2wdq2	oh115	1992	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes	WyB	774	537477	2wdq0	oh115	1992	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes	WoB	6	1425661	1jvj2	oh119	1989	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes	WoC	3	1425662	2wdq1	oh119	1989	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes	WoC	3838	537045	2wdq1	oh121	1986	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes	WoB	1300	537044	l0v0	oh121	1986	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes	WoD	1200	537046	2wdq3	oh121	1986	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes	WpC2	91	1481788	2wdq2	oh121	1986	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes	WpB	23	1481787	2wdq0	oh121	1986	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes	WtC	867	537602	2wdq1	oh127	1984	1:15840
Woodsfield-Zanesville silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes	WzC	6454	536585	2wdq6	oh167	1973	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes	WtC	6182	536582	2wdq2	oh167	1973	1:15840
Woodsfield-Zanesville silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes	WzB	3105	536584	2wdq5	oh167	1973	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes	WtB	2098	536581	2wdq0	oh167	1973	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes	WtD	950	536583	l0c4	oh167	1973	1:15840
Westmoreland-Woodsfield silt loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	WmW1D2	922	2454763	2ndcx	oh167	1973	1:15840
Woodsfield silt loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes	WoC	420	514719	k8lv	wv612	1984	1:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the WOODSFIELD soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).