Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the WINTERS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of WINTERS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to WINTERS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the WINTERS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the WINTERS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WINTERS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WINTERS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with WINTERS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WINTERS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WINTERS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with WINTERS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. TX-2010-11-05-04 | Young County - 2009

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Grandfield-Gowen and Lincoln-Westola-Padgett general soil map units (Soil Survey of Young County, Texas; 2009).

  2. TX-2012-03-19-11 | Archer County - April 1995

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Kamay-Deandale general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Archer County, TX; 1995).

Map Units

Map units containing WINTERS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Winters loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesWnA205643624602y88wtx00919861:24000
Winters loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWnB158873624612y88xtx00919861:24000
Winters loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesWnA43303627412y88wtx02319711:24000
Winters loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWnB30773627422y88xtx02319711:24000
Winters loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes572593363912d6p3tx07719771:24000
Winters fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWtB2026364051d6tltx08319681:24000
Winters fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesWtA895364050d6tktx08319681:24000
Winters fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWfB61953658202z16ktx15119641:24000
Winters fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesWfA10583658192z16mtx15119641:24000
Winters fine sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, moderately erodedWfC27783658212z16jtx15119641:24000
Winters loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWnB2890368069dc06tx23719921:24000
Winters fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesWnA102133682672z16mtx25319661:20000
Winters fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWnB81283682682z16ktx25319661:20000
Rotan-Winters-Miles complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes29121643687302z16htx27519751:24000
Winters fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes4576903687482z16mtx27519751:24000
Cobb-Winters complex, dry, 1 to 3 percent slopesCwB27053717672y88stx39919651:20000
Winters fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes, moderately erodedWnB225323718052z16ltx39919651:20000
Winters fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWnB20893718042z16ktx39919651:20000
Winters fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesWnA12483718032z16mtx39919651:20000
Cobb-Winters complex, dry, 3 to 5 percent slopesCwC8933717682y88ttx39919651:20000
Cobb-Winters complex, dry, 0 to 1 percent slopesCwA5273717662y88ptx39919651:20000
Winters fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWfB20194371985dh2jtx41119801:24000
Winters fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesWfA7035371984dh2htx41119801:24000
Winters loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWnB84153733982y88xtx48519721:20000
Winters loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesWnA60883733972y88wtx48519721:20000
Urban land-Winters complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesWuB32243734012y88ztx48519721:20000
Winters loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesWnC9173733992y88ytx48519721:20000
Winters loam, wetWs449373400djk5tx48519721:20000
Winters loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesWmA13593734572y88wtx48719601:20000
Winters loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesWtB7268373788djyptx50320031:24000
Winters fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes7916443391058f3xstx60219751:24000
Winters fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, moderately eroded802111391060f3xvtx60219751:24000
Winters fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes781541391057f3xrtx60219751:24000
Winters-Urban land complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes81717391061f3xwtx60219751:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the WINTERS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .