Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TUPELO soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TUPELO, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TUPELO were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
12802N0186S2002AL103001Tupelo7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties34.4375267,-87.0084457

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TUPELO soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TUPELO series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TUPELO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TUPELO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TUPELO share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TUPELO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TUPELO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TUPELO, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. TN-2010-11-02-33 | Rhea County - 2005

    The relationship of soils, geology, and parent materials in the Pailo-Fullerton-Tasso and Colbert-Lyerly-Ketona-Capshaw general soil map units (Soil Survey of Rhea County, Tennessee; 2005).

Map Units

Map units containing TUPELO as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Tupelo silt loamTu1492328400c0qkal00919741:24000
Tupelo-Colbert complex, 0 to 4 percent slopesTuB7669328711c11lal03319861:20000
Tupelo silt loamTk500329225c1l5al04919531:20000
Tupelo silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesTuA769329611c1zmal05919621:15840
Tupelo silt loam, level phaseTuv4806522968kk5yal07119431:24000
Tupelo silt loam, undulating phaseTuu2995522967kk5xal07119431:24000
Tupelo-Urban land complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes4310040329943c2bbal07319801:24000
Tupelo silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes423860329942c2b9al07319801:24000
Tupelo silt loamTo2411330186c2l5al07919501:20000
Tupelo loamTn1164330185c2l4al07919501:20000
Tupelo silt loamTu6457523201kkfgal08919581:24000
Tupelo silt loam, overwashTv814523202kkfhal08919581:24000
Tupelo silt loam, overwashTe611330758c35mal09519561:20000
Tupelo silt loam, eroded, gently slopingTdB2555330757c35lal09519561:20000
Tupelo silt loam, levelTdA333330756c35kal09519561:20000
Tupelo silty clay loam, severely eroded, gently slopingTfB3111330759c35nal09519561:20000
Tupelo silt loamTu6239331173c3m0al10319491:15840
Tupelo loamTt1848331172c3lzal10319491:15840
Tupelo loam, frequently floodedTu8120331464c3xdal11719821:24000
Tupelo-Dewey complexTx4090331465c3xfal11719821:24000
Dewey-Tupelo-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesDtC960331434c3wfal11719821:24000
Tupelo silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely floodedTpA1085531214ktryga04719871:20000
Tupelo silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedTuA1040531215ktrzga04719871:20000
Tupelo silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedTuA1613531419ktzkga61920121:24000
Tupelo clay loam, frequently floodedTv10560531309ktw0ga62119751:20000
Tupelo silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesTu1180531308ktvzga62119751:20000
Tupelo silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally floodedTu27165294052v5crtn00319981:24000
Tupelo silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesTu7755273712v5cqtn05519651:15840
Elk and Tupelo silt loams, undulating phasesEb481525123kmfgtn05919541:15840
Elk and Tupelo silt loams, eroded rolling phaseEa425525122kmfftn05919541:15840
Tupelo silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesTu4859101788913564tn06519801:15840
Tupelo silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally floodedTu33085258522v5crtn10319991:24000
Tupelo silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally floodedTu24465241022v5crtn11719991:24000
Hamblen-Tupelo complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedHa707815397851np8htn12119681:15840
Tupelo-Bloomingdale complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floodedTu109914212391jpxftn12119681:15840
Bloomingdale-Tupelo complex, frequently floodedBm68315422541nrv4tn12119681:15840
Tupelo silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally floodedTu2086257592v5crtn12720021:24000
Ketona-Tupelo complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floodedKt1662728816sgd6tn14320031:24000
Tupelo silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesTu43075282692v5cqtn14919741:15840
Tupelo silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesTu10505235902v5cqtn18719611:15840
Tupelo silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesTu9725284932v5cqtn18919881:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TUPELO soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .