Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SULLY soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SULLY, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SULLY were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
7290P072090NE057021Sully7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.0186119,-101.7222214
7289P0139S1988NE057007Sully6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.279461,-101.524906

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SULLY soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SULLY series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SULLY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SULLY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SULLY share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SULLY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SULLY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SULLY, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NE-2010-09-28-01 | Dundy County -

    Typical pattern of soil and underlying material in the Sanborn-Haigler-Calamus and Bigbend-Munjor-McCook associations (Soil Survey of Dundy County, Nebraska).

  2. NE-2010-09-28-05 | Dundy County -

    Typical pattern of soil and underlying material in the Sully association (Soil Survey of Dundy County, Nebraska).

  3. NE-2012-02-13-41 | Keith County - November 1995

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Sully-Dix-Tassel association (Soil Survey of Keith County, Nebraska; November 1995).

  4. NE-2012-02-13-42 | Keith County - November 1995

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Sully-McConaughy association (Soil Survey of Keith County, Nebraska; November 1995).

Map Units

Map units containing SULLY as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Uly-Sully silt loams, 17 to 30 percent slopes, eroded284210822281812zns2ne04119801:20000
Uly-Sully silt loams, 17 to 30 percent slopes, eroded2842659216993802zns2ne11319691:24000
Sully silt loam, 9 to 25 percent slopes20D2363354689cx2lsd02119781:20000
Sully-Zahl complex, 9 to 40 percent slopes21D53354693cx2qsd02119781:20000
Sully silt loam, 9 to 25 percent slopesSuE2648355071cxgxsd02319801:20000
Lowry-Sully silt loams, 9 to 15 percent slopesLsD636355051cxg8sd02319801:20000
Sully silt loam, 9 to 15 percent slopesSuD1141353336cvnysd06519701:20000
Sully silt loam, 2 to 9 percent slopesSuC634353335cvnxsd06519701:20000
Sully silt loam, 15 to 35 percent slopesSuE458353337cvnzsd06519701:20000
Sully silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesSuA444353334cvnwsd06519701:20000
Lowry-Sully silt loams, 9 to 25 percent slopesLrD1660355583cy0fsd08519841:20000
Sully silt loam, 15 to 40 percent slopesSlE520355623cy1qsd08519841:20000
Sully-Sansarc complex, 9 to 25 percent slopesSvE990353521cvvxsd11719771:24000
Sully silt loam, 9 to 25 percent slopesSuE492353520cvvwsd11719771:24000
Sully silt loam, 3 to 9 percent slopesSuC463353519cvvvsd11719771:24000
Sully silt loam, 12 to 25 percent slopesSuE794353130cvg9sd11919671:20000
Sully-Lowry silt loams, 3 to 12 percent slopesSwD348353131cvgbsd11919671:20000
Sully silt loam, 9 to 15 percent slopesSuD1804354527cwxcsd12919751:20000
Sully silt loam, 2 to 9 percent slopesSuC930354526cwxbsd12919751:20000
Sully silt loam, 15 to 40 percent slopesSuE110354528cwxdsd12919751:20000
Sully-Lowry silt loams, 9 to 25 percent slopesSoE2284355548cxz9sd60319831:20000
Sully-Schamber complex, 9 to 25 percent slopesSsE2021355549cxzbsd60319831:20000
Sully-Lowry silt loams, 6 to 9 percent slopesSoC828355547cxz8sd60319831:20000
Sully silt loam, 25 to 40 percent slopesSdF684355546cxz7sd60319831:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SULLY soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .