Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ROY soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ROY, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ROY were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ROY soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ROY series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ROY share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ROY, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing ROY as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Roy-Winifred complex, 8 to 45 percent slopes19524972342429chb3mt02719791:24000
Roy gravelly clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes19311437342427chb1mt02719791:24000
Roy very stony clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes19411038342428chb2mt02719791:24000
Roy gravelly clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes1927080342426chb0mt02719791:24000
Mocmont-Roy flaggy loams, 15 to 45 percent slopes1731391342405ch9bmt02719791:24000
Roy-Barkof-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes712F5120344254ck6zmt05119921:24000
Roy complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes71D4127344255ck70mt05119921:24000
Roy-Barkof complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes712E3726344253ck6ymt05119921:24000
Roy gravelly clay loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes71F1739344256ck71mt05119921:24000
Roy gravelly clay loam, 25 to 60 percent slopes71F97345255cl88mt10119921:24000
Work-Roy complex, 8 to 25 percent slopesWvR471474724yg5mt60219631:20000
Bitton and Roy soils, 10 to 65 percent slopes2856536341910cgscmt61319751:24000
Work-Roy complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes863E4084346957cn15mt61519921:24000
Roy very cobbly clay loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes71D1071346897cmz7mt61519921:24000
Roy gravelly loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes46E747154810562wmt61620031:24000
Roy gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes46D619154809562vmt61620031:24000
Danvers-Roy complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately impacted1446D53915526256kgmt61620031:24000
Roy-Shawmut-Danvers complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes351F4781547265605mt61620031:24000
Danvers-Roy complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, moderately impacted1446E37915526356khmt61620031:24000
Roy gravelly loam, 35 to 60 percent slopes46F343154811562xmt61620031:24000
Roy-Tolbert-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes, moderately impacted946F32215517056ghmt61620031:24000
Roy gravelly loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes, moderately impacted246E29715466255y3mt61620031:24000
Roy-Tolbert-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, moderately impacted946E27715516956ggmt61620031:24000
Danvers-Roy complex, 4 to 8 percent slopes, moderately impacted1446C15015526156kfmt61620031:24000
Roy gravelly loam, 2 to 4 percent slopes46B133154807562smt61620031:24000
Roy gravelly loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes46C116154808562tmt61620031:24000
Roy gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately impacted246D11115466155y2mt61620031:24000
Roy gravelly loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes, moderately impacted1046C8215525756k9mt61620031:24000
Roy-Shawmut-Danvers complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes351E806095714wlbmt61620031:24000
Danvers-Roy complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes, moderately impacted1446F5615526456kjmt61620031:24000
Roy-Shawmut-Danvers complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes, moderately impacted951F5115522356j6mt61620031:24000
Danvers-Roy complex, 2 to 4 percent slopes, moderately impacted646B4215522756jbmt61620031:24000
Roy-Tolbert complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes846F3815510456dcmt61620031:24000
Roy-Shawmut-Danvers complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes351E104341443474wlbmt62119971:24000
Roy-Fergus complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes746E49931445634vfbmt62119971:24000
Danvers-Roy complex, 4 to 8 percent slopes446C24281444194v8pmt62119971:24000
Danvers-Roy complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes446D22221444204v8qmt62119971:24000
Roy-Fergus complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes746D20321445624vf9mt62119971:24000
Danvers-Roy complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes446E18651444214v8rmt62119971:24000
Roy-Tolbert-Danvers complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes646D15401445404vdlmt62119971:24000
Roy-Shawmut-Danvers cobbly loams, 35 to 60 percent slopes351F14571443484v6dmt62119971:24000
Roy-Carett-Elflint complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes17E11761442474v34mt62119971:24000
Roy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes46D11591444384v99mt62119971:24000
Roy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes46E9061444394v9bmt62119971:24000
Roy stony loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes246E8921442914v4kmt62119971:24000
Roy-Tolbert-Danvers complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes646E8531445414vdmmt62119971:24000
Roy cobbly loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes146E6611442194v27mt62119971:24000
Roy-Fergus complex, 4 to 8 percent slopes746C6331445614vf8mt62119971:24000
Roy cobbly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes146D5391442184v26mt62119971:24000
Roy loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes46C4761444374v98mt62119971:24000
Roy-Fergus complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes746F4471445644vfcmt62119971:24000
Danvers-Roy complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes446B3591444184v8nmt62119971:24000
Roy-Shawmut-Danvers complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes351D2501443464v6bmt62119971:24000
Roy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes46B2191444364v97mt62119971:24000
Roy loam, 35 to 60 percent slopes46F1671444404v9cmt62119971:24000
Danvers-Roy complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes446F1261444224v8smt62119971:24000
Roy stony loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes246D1151442904v4jmt62119971:24000
Roy cobbly loam, 2 to 4 percent slopes146B651442164v24mt62119971:24000
Roy cobbly loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes146C371442174v25mt62119971:24000
Roy cobbly clay loam, 15 to 60 percent slopes267E97315536256npmt62219971:24000
Roy, very bouldery-Quigley, very stony-Roy complex, 4 to 20 percent slopes700D128924871002ph11mt62420211:24000
Castner-Roy complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes676F362190222721vf5mt62420211:24000
Roy-Tamaneen complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes313C211317685050ywmt62420211:24000
Roy gravelly clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes9182D65317684950smmt62420211:24000
Roy gravelly clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes182C49317685150slmt62420211:24000
Roy-Shawmut-Danvers complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes351E113917032494wlbmt63520061:24000
Danvers-Roy complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes446D38117029581v524mt63520061:24000
Roy loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes46C18417029511v51xmt63520061:24000
Danvers-Roy complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes446E15417029591v525mt63520061:24000
Roy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes46D13717029521v51ymt63520061:24000
Roy-Fergus complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes746E6717030061v53pmt63520061:24000
Roy gravelly clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes182C875214971750slmt63920001:24000
Castner-Roy complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes178F517614971250sfmt63920001:24000
Roy-Tamaneen complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes313C488414988150ywmt63920001:24000
Roy-Swampcreek complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes252B294014981250wnmt63920001:24000
Roy gravelly clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes182D186414971850smmt63920001:24000
Roy-Turner complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes295B178814986550ycmt63920001:24000
Overfelt-Roy complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes268B92714983350xbmt63920001:24000
Roy, extremely stony-Turner complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes311C60814987850ysmt63920001:24000
Work-Roy, bouldery-Bigsag family complex, 2 to 35 percent slopes429E577149994512jmt63920001:24000
Roy cobbly loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes401B517149962511hmt63920001:24000
Roy gravelly loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes294B28714986450ybmt63920001:24000
Roy-Shawmut-Danvers complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes351E413651456794wlbmt64419951:24000
Roy-Shawmut-Danvers complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes351F85611456804wlcmt64419951:24000
Danvers-Roy complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes446D76521457464wnhmt64419951:24000
Roy gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes46D54651457614wnzmt64419951:24000
Roy-Tolbert complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes846E45531459224wv5mt64419951:24000
Roy-Tolbert complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes846D43811459214wv4mt64419951:24000
Roy gravelly loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes46C36101457604wnymt64419951:24000
Roy gravelly loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes46B23471457594wnxmt64419951:24000
Danvers-Roy complex, 4 to 8 percent slopes446C17491457454wngmt64419951:24000
Danvers-Roy complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes446B15741457444wnfmt64419951:24000
Roy cobbly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes146D6181455514wg6mt64419951:24000
Roy-Tolbert complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes846F5341459234wv6mt64419951:24000
Roy cobbly loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes146E2161455524wg7mt64419951:24000
Bigbear-Roy loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes150C16681156844586hmt6691:24000
Bigbear-Roy cobbly clay loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes250C24911569005889mt6691:24000
Bigbear-Roy loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes150D1353156845586jmt6691:24000
Roy-Bigbear clay loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes152B897156847586lmt6691:24000
Bigbear-Roy cobbly clay loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes250D545156901588bmt6691:24000
Bigbear-Roy, extremely stony complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes3413D332696032rc8nmt6691:24000
Roy, rubbly-Tibs, extremly stony-Rubble land complex, 4 to 25 percent slopes8505E81699358rgqymt6691:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ROY soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .