Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ROOTEL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ROOTEL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ROOTEL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ROOTEL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ROOTEL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROOTEL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROOTEL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ROOTEL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROOTEL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROOTEL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ROOTEL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing ROOTEL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Rootel channery loam, 3 to 9 percent slopesRtC27371475374yj8mt60919711:24000
Rencot-Rootel complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes15E24011476524ymzmt60919711:24000
Skein-Rootel complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes11E23971476484ymvmt60919711:24000
Rootel-Skein-Whitesage complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes10D3611476474ymtmt60919711:24000
Rootel-Musselshell loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes41C9121478144yt6mt63019911:24000
Delpoint-Cabbart-Rootel loams, 2 to 15 percent slopes776C30062348796cpyhmt65719901:24000
Rootel-Rentsac complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes277B6514348527cpntmt65719901:24000
Rootel-Marmarth loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes177C3352348399cpjpmt65719901:24000
Rootel-Varney complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes178E45114246931jthvmt67020071:24000
Feltner-Rootel complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes64599514830751ls84wy0411:24000
Feltner-Rootel complex, 6 to 15 percent slopes51549914802141lp8vwy0411:24000
Whitesage-Rootel complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes55379914802101lp8qwy0411:24000
Feltner-Rootel complex, 3 to 6 percent slopes50373514802011lp8fwy0411:24000
Feltner-Rootel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes49244914802021lp8gwy0411:24000
Foreleft-like, extremely bouldery-Rootel, very stony-Fishers-like, rubbly complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes440732090532zdqkwy6291:24000
Rootel-Galbreth-Chickenhill complex, 10 to 35 percent slopes549632504662zv6qwy6291:24000
Redsage-Rootel complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes1001297126119552qstywy7231:24000
Rootel channery loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes -- draft820143126119342qst7wy7231:24000
Delpoint-Rootel complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes -- draft820221226119352qst8wy7231:24000
Cusheet-Rootel family-Zagplat complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes411432224982ztm8wy7371:24000
Tabyago-Rencot-Rootel complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes2817895926119472qstpwy7371:24000
Bonhigh family-Rootel-Whitesage family, complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes2704628726119732qsvmwy7371:24000
Roto, deep-Rootel, deep complex, 2 to 9 percent slopes -- draft2851178526119482qstqwy7371:24000
Rencot-Rootel complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes -- draft2542111925723312mtjswy7371:24000
Rootel-Rencot-Gompers complex, 6 to 30 percent slopes -- draft5374602572520jx24wy7371:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ROOTEL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .