Soil Data Explorer - RICHFORD

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the RICHFORD soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of RICHFORD, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to RICHFORD were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
90B	83P0844	S1983WI017002	Richford	5	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	44.98445,-91.26739

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the RICHFORD soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the RICHFORD series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the RICHFORD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the RICHFORD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with RICHFORD share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the RICHFORD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the RICHFORD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with RICHFORD, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing RICHFORD as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Richford loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes	RfB	7856	422962	2wpww	wi001	1978	1:20000
Richford loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	RfA	2246	422961	2wpwv	wi001	1978	1:20000
Richford loamy sand, 6 to 12 percent slopes	RfC	542	422963	2wpwy	wi001	1978	1:20000
Richford loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes	RfA	1088	421574	g4p5	wi017	1985	1:15840
Richford loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes	RaB	799	423740	2wpww	wi047	1974	1:20000
Richford loamy sand, 6 to 12 percent slopes	RaC	297	423741	2wpwy	wi047	1974	1:20000
Richford loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	RfA	22433	426550	2wpwv	wi097	1972	1:20000
Richford loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes	RfB	17937	426551	2wpww	wi097	1972	1:20000
Richford loamy sand, 6 to 12 percent slopes	RfC	4636	426552	2wpwy	wi097	1972	1:20000
Richford loamy fine sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes	RgB	1739	426553	2wpx0	wi097	1972	1:20000
Richford loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes	RfB	12089	422739	2wpww	wi135	1982	1:15840
Richford loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	RfA	4728	422738	2wpwv	wi135	1982	1:15840
Richford loamy sand, 6 to 12 percent slopes	RfC	3809	422740	2wpwy	wi135	1982	1:15840
Richford loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes	RfB	30520	423984	2wpww	wi137	1986	1:20000
Richford loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	RfA	19818	423983	2wpwv	wi137	1986	1:20000
Richford loamy sand, 6 to 12 percent slopes	RfC	9024	423985	2wpwy	wi137	1986	1:20000
Richford loamy sand, 12 to 20 percent slopes	RfD	3943	423986	2wpwz	wi137	1986	1:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the RICHFORD soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).