Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the PROSPER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of PROSPER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to PROSPER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the PROSPER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the PROSPER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PROSPER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PROSPER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with PROSPER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PROSPER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PROSPER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with PROSPER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. SD-2012-03-15-15 | Davison County - January 1974

    Typical pattern of Houdek and Stickney soils in association 3 and of Houdek, Prosper, and Tetonka in association 4 (Soil Survey of Davison County, SD; 1974).

  2. SD-2012-03-15-16 | Davison County - January 1974

    Typical pattern of soils in associations 5 and 7 near the James River and Firesteel Creek (Soil Survey of Davison County, SD; 1974).

  3. SD-2012-03-15-24 | Douglas County - June 1981

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Clarno-Ethan-Prosper association (Soil Survey of Douglas County, SD; 1981).

  4. SD-2012-03-15-50 | Hyde County - 1998

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Glenham-Prosper-Java association (Soil Survey of Hyde County, SD; 1998).

  5. SD-2012-03-15-58 | Jerauld County - September 1994

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Clarno-Ethan-Prosper association (Soil Survey of Jerauld County, SD; 1994).

  6. SD-2012-03-15-67 | Lake County - December 1973

    Relationship of soils to topography and the underlying materials in the Houdek-Prosper association (Soil Survey of Lake County, SD; 1973).

  7. SD-2012-03-15-89 | Potter County - October 1985

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Glenham-Java association (Soil Survey of Potter County, SD; 1985).

Map Units

Map units containing PROSPER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Houdek-Prosper loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesHpA374363548582tlbgsd00319791:20000
Plankinton-Prosper complexPt13881354866cx89sd00319791:20000
Houdek-Prosper loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesHoB1499633545872tlbksd00519761:20000
Houdek-Prosper loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesHoA871243545862tlbgsd00519761:20000
Prosper-Davison loams, 0 to 3 percent slopesPrA1479354597cwzmsd00519761:20000
Prosper loamPr895355065cxgqsd02319801:20000
Houdek-Prosper loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesHpA28614177422tlbgsd02519921:20000
Houdek-Ethan-Prosper loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesHnB16584177402tlb9sd02519921:20000
Houdek-Prosper loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesHpB14064177432tlbksd02519921:20000
Houdek-Ethan-Prosper loams, 2 to 9 percent slopesHnC594177412tlbbsd02519921:20000
Houdek-Prosper loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesHkA667743529242tlbgsd03519661:20000
Lamo and Prosper soils, 0 to 3 percent slopesLpA1938352928cv7ssd03519661:20000
Prosper silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesPrA1531352929cv7tsd03519661:20000
Prosper silt loam, 3 to 6 percent slopesPrB802352930cv7vsd03519661:20000
Clarno-Ethan-Prosper loams, 0 to 3 percent slopesCnA9781354882cx8tsd04319791:20000
Prosper-Tetonka complexPt9061354913cx9tsd04319791:20000
Glenham-Java-Prosper loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesWvB61053552082wkp1sd04919811:20000
Houdek-Prosper loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesHkA9633628627492tlbgsd05919591:20000
Houdek-Prosper loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesHkB916953526182tlbksd05919591:20000
Glenham-Propser loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesWnB688373526922wbpqsd05919591:20000
Glenham-Prosper loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesWnA155033526912wbppsd05919591:20000
Prosper-Stickney loams, nearly levelBcA10705352580ctwksd05919591:20000
Stickney-Prosper loams, nearly levelCrA1622352589ctwvsd05919591:20000
Glenham-Java-Prosper loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesGmB941413537972wkp1sd06919921:20000
Glenham-Prosper-Hoven complex, 0 to 4 percent slopesGsA31364353801cw4ysd06919921:20000
Glenham-Prosper loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesGrA114143537992wbppsd06919921:20000
Java-Glenham-Prosper loams, 1 to 9 percent slopesJhC8858353816cw5fsd06919921:20000
Glenham-Propser loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesGrB36073538002wbpqsd06919921:20000
Java, stony-Glenham-Prosper loams, 1 to 9 percent slopesJaC2695353811cw58sd06919921:20000
Prosper loamPs1152353838cw64sd06919921:20000
Houdek-Ethan-Prosper loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesHwB310433564462tlb9sd07319871:20000
Houdek-Ethan-Prosper loams, 2 to 9 percent slopesHwC279293564472tlbbsd07319871:20000
Hand-Ethan-Prosper loams, 1 to 5 percent slopesHaB79993564352yyghsd07319871:20000
Houdek-Prosper loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesHyA65443564482tlbgsd07319871:20000
Hand-Ethan-Prosper loams, 2 to 9 percent slopesHaC47623564362yygjsd07319871:20000
Hand-Prosper loams, 0 to 3 percent slopesHcA21883564372yyggsd07319871:20000
Houdek-Prosper loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesHpB17354174882tlbksd07719921:20000
Houdek-Prosper loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesHpA1404174872tlbgsd07719921:20000
Houdek-Prosper loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesHpA45574165042tlbgsd07919671:20000
Prosper loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesPrA2047416510fzdtsd07919671:20000
Glenham-Ethan-Prosper loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesJgB1584635534230t2ysd10719831:20000
Glenham-Prosper loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesGrA474435532930t2zsd10719831:20000
Glenham-Prosper-Plankinton complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesGpB314535532830t38sd10719831:20000
Glenham-Prosper loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesGrB71535533030t30sd10719831:20000
Glenham-Ethan, very stony-Prosper loams, 2 to 9 percent slopesJaC196341156130t39sd10719831:20000
Houdek-Prosper loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesHeA68723547942tlbgsd11119781:20000
Houdek-Prosper loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesHeB54963547952tlbksd11119781:20000
Houdek-Ethan-Prosper loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesHtB52103566552tlb9sd11519971:24000
Houdek-Prosper loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesHuA5223566572tlbgsd11519971:24000
Houdek-Prosper loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesHuB3373566582tlbksd11519971:24000
Houdek-Ethan-Prosper loams, 2 to 9 percent slopesHtC523566562tlbbsd11519971:24000
Glenham-Ethan-Prosper loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesGlB1105335307830t2ysd11919671:20000
Glenham-Prosper loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesGlA888135307730t2zsd11919671:20000
Glenham-Prosper-Plankinton complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesGpB2341157230t38sd11919671:20000
Glenham-Ethan-Prosper loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesGmB10341157330t2ysd12919751:20000
Prosper-Stickney complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesPr62321417991g0ylsd60219751:20000
Prosper and Crossplain complexPs14496417992g0ymsd60219751:20000
Glenham-Java-Prosper loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesGkB460003555042wkp1sd60319831:20000
Glenham-Prosper loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesGhA42673555032wbppsd60319831:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the PROSPER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .