Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the NORLO soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of NORLO, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to NORLO were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
43C00P1207S2000OR023001Norlo5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.9576225,-119.6621857

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the NORLO soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the NORLO series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the sibling sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NORLO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NORLO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with NORLO share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the competing sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NORLO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NORLO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with NORLO, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing NORLO as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Norlo-Normauk complex, 10 to 40 percent north slopesC5801627234260681qkglor6181:24000
Nerrad-Norlo complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes1783CO142763426151130zfor6181:24000
Norlo-Shotsprings complex, 10 to 40 percent slopesN3101401934261412mtyor6181:24000
Normauk-Norlo complex, 15 to 30 percent slopesN1101366934260791qkhsor6181:24000
Norlo-Crosswhite complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes1782BO101663426174130zcor6181:24000
Norlo-Normauk complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopesC720484334260621qkgsor6181:24000
Bigmow-Norlo-Kidnapspring complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes3451CO408934349011356lor6181:24000
Norlo gravelly ashy sandy loam, 10 to 40 percent north slopesP240406134261901qkkmor6181:24000
Normauk-Norlo complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopesN320364134261611qkhvor6181:24000
Maucav-Canest-Norlo complex, 0 to 20 percent slopesP307266234261771qv5kor6181:24000
Norlo-Scarpal-Hafling complex, 20 to 60 percent north slopesC510264834260901qkgcor6181:24000
Crosswhite-Norlo complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes1790AO22603437587130zbor6181:24000
Norlo-Shotsprings-Hafmau complex, 0 to 20 percent slopesN675198234261971qkjmor6181:24000
Scarpal-Norlo-Hafling complex, 10 to 50 percent slopesC780120534374451qkgwor6181:24000
Norlo-Jackalope-Nerrad complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes1789CO11183426142130zgor6181:24000
Norlo-Scarpal complex, 5 to 20 percent slopesQ24590334349571qkl5or6181:24000
Norlo-Skullhollow complex, 15 to 40 percent slopesN39082434346491qkj2or6181:24000
Norlo-Spurbutte complex, 10 to 40 percent slopesQ27073834319791qkl6or6181:24000
Norlo-Crosswhite complex, mass failure, 15 to 30 percent slopes1782AM6173426121130zdor6181:24000
Norlo-Spurbutte complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes4305NO1133853891qkl6or62620181:24000
Norlo-Spurbutte complex, 10 to 40 percent slopesQ270100434319821qkl6or6271:24000
Norlo-Shotsprings complex, 10 to 40 percent slopesN31079034251422mtyor6271:24000
Norlo-Normauk complex, 10 to 40 percent north slopesC58052934250331qkglor6271:24000
Norlo-Shotsprings-Hafmau complex, 0 to 20 percent slopesN67518934260371qkjmor6271:24000
Norlo-Crosswhite complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes1782BO823425179130zcor6271:24000
Norlo-Skullhollow complex, 15 to 40 percent slopesN3903734346341qkj2or6271:24000
Norlo-Normauk complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopesC720182734217841qkgsor6771:24000
Norlo-Normauk complex, 10 to 40 percent north slopesC580121934218361qkglor6771:24000
Norlo-Scarpal-Hafling complex, 20 to 60 percent north slopesC51078334219791qkgcor6771:24000
Normauk-Norlo complex, 15 to 30 percent slopesN11022534218921qkhsor6771:24000
Nerrad-Norlo complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes1783CO1543424721130zfor6771:24000
Norlo-Shotsprings-Hafmau complex, 0 to 20 percent slopesN67511334249971qkjmor6771:24000
Norlo-Crosswhite complex, mass failure, 15 to 30 percent slopes1782AM983424567130zdor6771:24000
Maucav-Canest-Norlo complex, 0 to 20 percent slopesP3075134248351qv5kor6771:24000
Norlo-Crosswhite complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes1782BO293424820130zcor6771:24000
Norlo-Jackalope-Nerrad complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes1789CO293424696130zgor6771:24000
Norlo gravelly ashy sandy loam, 10 to 40 percent north slopesP2401434248711qkkmor6771:24000
Norlo-Shotsprings complex, 10 to 40 percent slopesN310634246952mtyor6771:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the NORLO soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .