Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MITKOF soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MITKOF, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MITKOF were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MITKOF soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

There are insufficient data to create the water balance bar figure.



There are insufficient data to create the water balance line figure.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MITKOF series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MITKOF series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MITKOF series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MITKOF share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MITKOF series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MITKOF series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MITKOF, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing MITKOF as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Mitkof sandy loam, 35 to 60 percent slopes78D10015498011nthak64419941:31680
McGilvery-Mitkof complex, 60 to 100 percent slopes79EF7583498031ntkak64419941:31680
McGilvery-Mitkof complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes79D3248498021ntjak64419941:31680
Mitkof-Mosman complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes34D79097494931nhkak64519921:31680
Kupreanof-Mitkof complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes23B58747494771nh1ak64519921:31680
Mitkof sandy loam, 5 to 35 percent slopes46B55660495301njrak64519921:31680
Mitkof-Mosman complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes34B47643494921nhjak64519921:31680
Kupreanof-Mitkof complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes23D23967494781nh2ak64519921:31680
Mitkof sandy loam, 35 to 65 percent slopes46D23255495311njsak64519921:31680
Mosman-Mitkof complex, 75 to 100 percent slopes34F8742494941nhlak64519921:31680
Kwatahein-Mitkof complex, 0 to 35 percent slopes6B1851495651nkwak64519921:31680
Kwatahein-Mitkof complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes6D1328495661nkxak64519921:31680
Mitkof sandy loam, 65 to 80 percent slopes46F911495321njtak64519921:31680
Tolstoi, Mitkof, and Kupreanof soils, subalpine, broken, 36 to 55 percent slopes3695C26892500301p1wak64619921:31680
Mitkof-Tolstoi-Kaikli complex, 36 to 55 percent slopes3662C19248500181p1hak64619921:31680
Kupreanof-Tuxekan-Mitkof complex, 6 to 35 percent slopes5256B16991501091p4fak64619921:31680
Mitkof loam, broken, 36 to 55 percent slopes3645C11941499961p0sak64619921:31680
Mitkof loam, sloping lowlands, 6 to 35 percent slopes6145B11708501361p59ak64619921:31680
Mitkof loam, footslopes, 6 to 35 percent slopes5145B11024500991p43ak64619921:31680
Kupreanof-Mitkof complex, broken, 36 to 55 percent slopes3657C9989500111p18ak64619921:31680
Baranof-Mitkof complex, 6 to 35 percent slopes5293B7488501141p4lak64619921:31680
Tolstoi, Mitkof, and Kupreanof soils, subalpine, rounded summit, 36 to 55 percent slopes1295C4686498431nvvak64619921:31680
Kupreanof-Mitkof complex, broken, 56 to 75 percent slopes3657D4587500121p19ak64619921:31680
Kupreanof-Mitkof complex, smooth, 56 to 75 percent slopes3557D4292499531nzdak64619921:31680
Mitkof-Tolstoi-Kaikli complex, broken, 56 to 75 percent slopes3662D3612500191p1jak64619921:31680
Mitkof loam, shallowly incised, 36 to 55 percent slopes3245C3348498971nxlak64619921:31680
Mitkof loam, smooth, 36 to 55 percent slopes3545C2412499411nz0ak64619921:31680
Kupreanof-Mitkof complex, shallowly incised, 56 to 75 percent slopes3257D2377499081nxyak64619921:31680
Mitkof loam, deeply incised, 36 to 55 percent slopes3145C2319498611nwfak64619921:31680
Mitkof-Tolstoi-Kaikli complex, shallowly incised, 56 to 75 percent slopes3262D2249499111ny1ak64619921:31680
Mitkof-Tolstoi-Kaikli complex, smooth, 56 to 75 percent slopes3562D950499561nzhak64619921:31680
Mitkof-Tolstoi-Kaikli complex, deeply incised, 56 to 75 percent slopes3162D912498701nwqak64619921:31680
Mitkof loam, smooth hills, 36 to 55 percent slopes4445C808500781p3fak64619921:31680
Kupreanof-Mitkof complex, dissected hills, 56 to 75 percent slopes4357D346500731p38ak64619921:31680

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MITKOF soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .