Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LANGFORD soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LANGFORD, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LANGFORD were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
13940A035656PA049005Langford4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.007782,-79.9383698
14068PA0150101968PA015010Langford5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.7016667,-76.6955556
14089P042088NY097001Langford3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.5441666,-76.7527771
14040A0258S1963NY011003Langford6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.7272224,-76.3016663

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LANGFORD soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LANGFORD series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LANGFORD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LANGFORD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LANGFORD share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LANGFORD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LANGFORD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LANGFORD, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NY-2010-09-28-02 | Cattarugus County - 2007

    Representative landscape showing the relationship of some important soils and their parent material. The exaggerated schematics represent some typical soil profiles (Soil Survey of Cattarugus County, New York; 2007).

  2. NY-2012-02-15-06 | Cayuga County - 1971

    Typical cross section of Langford-Erie association and Langford-Howard association in the southeastern part of the county (Soil Survey of Cayuga County, New York; 1971).

  3. NY-2012-02-15-11 | Chautauqua County - August 1994

    Representative landscape showing the relationship of some important soils and their parent material. The exaggerated schematics represent some typical soil profiles (Soil Survey of Chautauqua County, New York; August 1994).

  4. NY-2012-02-15-43 | Seneca County - April 1972

    Cross section of Langford-Erie and Conesus-Lansing associations in southern part of Seneca County (Soil Survey of Seneca County, New York; April 1972).

  5. NY-2012-02-15-48 | Tompkins County - July 1965

    Typical cross section of southern Tompkins County soils, consisting mainly of low-lime and very low-lime soils with a fragipan (Soil Survey of Tompkins County, New York; July 1965).

  6. NY-2012-02-16-08 | Wyoming County - April 1974

    Typical pattern of soils in association 18 (Soil Survey of Wyoming County, New York; April 1974).

Map Units

Map units containing LANGFORD as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes63C53392896692ywp4ny00920021:24000
Langford channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes63B23182896682ywphny00920021:24000
Langford channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes63D22672896702ywp6ny00920021:24000
Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesLgB249552894302ywp2ny01119681:15840
Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesLgC52832894312ywp4ny01119681:15840
Langford channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesLgD31042894332ywp6ny01119681:15840
Langford channery silt loam, rollingLgCK24522894322ywp5ny01119681:15840
Langford-Howard complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesLhC16472894352ywpdny01119681:15840
Langford-Howard complex, 25 to 45 percent slopesLhE14932894372ywpgny01119681:15840
Langford channery silt loam, moderately shallow variant, 2 to 8 percent slopesLnB8132894389q5qny01119681:15840
Langford-Howard complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesLhD7842894362ywpfny01119681:15840
Langford-Howard complex, 2 to 8 percent slopesLhB7742894342ywpcny01119681:15840
Langford silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesLnB56742898492ywp7ny01319881:15840
Langford silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesLnC38612898502ywp8ny01319881:15840
Langford channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesLfB43722908372ywphny02919791:15840
Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesLfC25292908382ywp4ny02919791:15840
Langford channery silt loam, silty substratum, 8 to 15 percent slopesLgC21592908409rmyny02919791:15840
Langford channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesLfD9892908392ywp6ny02919791:15840
Langford channery silt loam, silty substratum, 15 to 25 slopesLgD9132908419rmzny02919791:15840
Langford channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes63B268431128552ywphny05120191:24000
Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes63C213231128562ywp4ny05120191:24000
Langford channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes63D80831128572ywp6ny05120191:24000
Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes63C204824824582ywp4ny06920121:12000
Langford-Erie channery silt loams, 3 to 8 percent slopes64B102825042652wn37ny06920121:12000
Langford channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes63D60825124162ywp6ny06920121:12000
Langford channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes63B2825124132ywphny06920121:12000
Nunda and Langford channery silt loams, 8 to 15 percent slopesNlC12042945309wgzny09519651:15840
Nunda and Langford channery silt loams, 15 to 25 percent slopesNlD7292945329wh1ny09519651:15840
Nunda and Langford channery silt loams, 3 to 8 percent slopesNlB4072945299wgyny09519651:15840
Nunda and Langford channery silt loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes, erodedNlC31702945319wh0ny09519651:15840
Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesLgB45632947352ywp2ny09919661:15840
Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, erodedLgC36242947372ywpbny09919661:15840
Langford channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesLgD1862947382ywp6ny09919661:15840
Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesLgC1782947362ywp4ny09919661:15840
Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesLaB220422956352ywp2ny10919631:20000
Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesLaC30052956372ywp4ny10919631:20000
Mardin and Langford soils, 15 to 25 percent slopesMfD18192956602vcknny10919631:20000
Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, erodedLaC313422956382ywpbny10919631:20000
Langford channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, erodedLaB37122956362ywp9ny10919631:20000
Langford channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesLaB198212953822ywphny12119691:20000
Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesLaC86252953832ywp4ny12119691:20000
Langford channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesLaD15942953842ywp6ny12119691:20000
Langford channery silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesLaA15722953812ywp1ny12119691:20000
Langford-Erie channery silt loams, 3 to 8 percent slopes64B1072214078092wn37ny12319481:12000
Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes63C350614078102ywp4ny12319481:12000
Langford channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes63B274432504032ywphny12319481:12000
Langford channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes63D14432504132ywp6ny12319481:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LANGFORD soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .