Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the KIEV soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of KIEV, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to KIEV were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the KIEV soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the KIEV series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the KIEV series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the KIEV series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with KIEV share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the KIEV series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the KIEV series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with KIEV, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing KIEV as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Judith-Kiev loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes698B207269466521lrmmt02719791:24000
Crago-Kiev association, steepCV131361467884xr3mt60019691:24000
Kiev loam, shale substratum, 4 to 8 percent slopesKk66711468414xstmt60019691:24000
Kiev gravelly loam, 4 to 8 percent slopesKp61861468454xsymt60019691:24000
Kiev gravelly loam, 2 to 4 percent slopesKo47731468444xsxmt60019691:24000
Kiev loam, 2 to 4 percent slopesKg22871468394xsrmt60019691:24000
Kiev loam, shale substratum, 2 to 4 percent slopesKh12721468404xssmt60019691:24000
Kiev gravelly loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesKn10631468434xswmt60019691:24000
Kiev gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesKr9741468464xszmt60019691:24000
Kiev loam, shale substratum, 8 to 15 percent slopesKm8411468424xsvmt60019691:24000
Windham-Kiev-Roundor complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes564D433039575pg4tmt60219631:20000
Windham-Kiev complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes63D43039576pg6jmt60219631:20000
Windham-Kiev complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes63D130396962l9vwmt61319751:24000
Judith-Kiev loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes698B6535189486321lrmmt62420211:24000
Kiev loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes642A1266189556521mh8mt62420211:24000
Kiev loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes642C1039189523121m4hmt62420211:24000
Kiev-Whitecow complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes691D1015189518421m2zmt62420211:24000
Kiev-Whitecow complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes691B70426102372r8crmt62420211:24000
Windham-Kiev-Roundor complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes564D582485183pg4tmt62420211:24000
Kiev-Fairfield complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes, foothills66C1931768312q9zrmt62420211:24000
Kiev-Martinsdale complex, 4 to 8 percent slopes, foothills566C531768354z1wmt62420211:24000
Windham-Kiev-Roundor complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes564D4812392825pg4tmt6321:24000
Windham-Kiev complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes63D2712392762pg6jmt6321:24000
Judith-Kiev loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes698B44269467921lrmmt6321:24000
Kiev-Work complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes, foothills266D1826044532q9zymt6321:24000
Windham-Kiev-Roundor complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes564D3876639214pg4tmt63720141:24000
Windham-Kiev complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes63D3574639267pg6jmt63720141:24000
Kiev-Fairfield complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes, foothills66C163525173542q9zrmt63720141:24000
Kiev-Fairfield complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes166C1393780882v6krmt63720141:24000
Kiev-Martinsdale complex, 4 to 8 percent slopes, foothills566C10011480524z1wmt63720141:24000
Kiev gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes266C8461480124z0lmt63720141:24000
Kiev-Work complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes, foothills266D69225230212q9zymt63720141:24000
Kiev-Martinsdale complex, 4 to 8 percent slopes766C69125173552q9zsmt63720141:24000
Danvers-Kiev complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes230B5011480014z07mt63720141:24000
Kiev-Work complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes66D493603548n819mt63720141:24000
Fairfield-Kiev complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes541C22115302441ncbqmt63720141:24000
Kiev-Roundor loams, 2 to 15 percent slopes184D16902348407cpjymt65719901:24000
Kiev-Winifred-Vanda complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes784C12256348798cpykmt65719901:24000
Judith-Kiev loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes120B9179348312cpfwmt65719901:24000
Kiev-Roundor-Windham complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes475F8397348676cptmmt65719901:24000
Kiev-Roundor gravelly loams, 2 to 15 percent slopes284D8259348534cpp1mt65719901:24000
Kiev-Judith gravelly loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes121B7145348314cpfymt65719901:24000
Kiev-Fairfield complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes117B2281348307cpfqmt65719901:24000
Judith-Kiev loams, 4 to 8 percent slopes120C1287348313cpfxmt65719901:24000
Windham-Kiev-Roundor complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes564D1522995248pg4tmt66620081:24000
Whitecow, extremely gravelly - Windham, very cobbly-Kiev complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes4301D4704697949rf8hmt6691:24000
Roundor-Kiev complex, 25 to 45 percent slopes2115627186262120j6kwy0411:24000
Fairfield-Bridgerton-Kiev association, 10 to 25 percent slopes107152186261420j6bwy0411:24000
Winspect-Kiev-Bigsheep families, complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes618179186262820j6swy6471:24000
Winspect-Kiev-Bigsheep families, complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes15L10885157750594qwy65620081:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the KIEV soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .