Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HILGER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HILGER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HILGER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HILGER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HILGER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HILGER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HILGER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HILGER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HILGER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HILGER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HILGER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing HILGER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Hilger stony loam, 4 to 25 percent slopes252E582344526ckhrmt06519961:24000
Hilger-Rock outcrop complex, 4 to 35 percent slopes252D385344525ckhqmt06519961:24000
Hilger extremely stony loam, 8 to 25 percent slopesHgE86111475104yhdmt60919711:24000
Cheadle-Hilger complex, 10 to 60 percent slopes4261426341926cgswmt61319751:24000
Hilger very stony loam, 15 to 50 percent slopes10031158341758cgmgmt61319751:24000
Hilger-Castner complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes10125105341759cgmhmt61319751:24000
Hilger very stony loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes9912608341988cgvwmt61319751:24000
Hilger, very stony-Hilger, rubbly-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes1564E138615063151r2mt62719981:24000
Martinsdale, stony-Martinsdale-Hilger complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes731C82515130852fxmt62719981:24000
Hilger, rubbly-Hilger complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes1563D52915063051r1mt62719981:24000
Hilger-Farnuf stony loams, 8 to 35 percent slopes567D121431478584yvmmt63019911:24000
Farnuf-Hilger stony loams, cool, 4 to 25 percent slopes499D59851478314ytrmt63019911:24000
Mocmont-Tolex-Hilger very stony loams, 15 to 45 percent slopes384E33441478014yssmt63019911:24000
Hilger-Regent-Castner stony loams, 15 to 35 percent slopes961E28851479424yybmt63019911:24000
Hilger stony loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes567B16901478574yvlmt63019911:24000
Hilger extremely stony loam, 8 to 45 percent slopes100E5711476824ynymt63019911:24000
Hilger, very stony-Hilger, rubbly-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes1564E20117030601v55fmt63520061:24000
Hilger-Wimper-Azaar complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes219D26424380342mtz8mt63819851:24000
Hilger-Castner-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes2851670348158cp8xmt65519751:24000
Winkler-Hilger-Rock outcrop association, steep6420569348198cpb6mt65519751:24000
Hilger-Rock outcrop complex, 4 to 35 percent slopes252D81215316511ndt3mt66620081:24000
Hilger stony loam, 4 to 25 percent slopes252E75715316531ndt5mt66620081:24000
Hilger cobbly loam, moist, 6 to 40 percent slopes, cobblyQ0528E72523757542wcb7sd08120071:24000
Hilger cobbly loam, moist, 0 to 6 percent slopes, cobblyQ0528B19923757532wcb6sd08120071:24000
Hilger cobbly loam, moist, 6 to 40 percent slopes, cobblyQ0528E19425139692wcb7sd60019741:24000
Hilger cobbly loam, moist, 0 to 6 percent slopes, cobblyQ0528B6525139672wcb6sd60019741:24000
Hilger, cobbly-Bullflat complex, 6 to 40 percent slopesQ0629E1005325865922wcb5sd60720111:24000
Bullflat-Hilger, cobbly complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesQ0629B495925865242wcb4sd60720111:24000
Hilger, cobbly-Metre, cool complex, 3 to 40 percent slopesQ0630E346725864252wcb8sd60720111:24000
Hilger cobbly loam, warm, 0 to 6 percent slopesP166B61527456602qt32sd60720111:24000
Hilger, warm-Metre complex, 10 to 40 percent slopesP168E56427456632qt34sd60720111:24000
Hilger cobbly loam, warm, 6 to 40 percent slopesP166E47827456612qt33sd60720111:24000
Hilger, warm-Urban land complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesP170B28527456642qt35sd60720111:24000
Hilger cobbly loam, moist, 0 to 6 percent slopes, cobblyQ0528B10625865712wcb6sd60720111:24000
Hilger cobbly loam, moist, 6 to 40 percent slopes, cobblyQ0528E7725865012wcb7sd60720111:24000
Hilger cobbly loam, warm, moist, 6 to 40 percent slopesP167E3627456622s03fsd60720111:24000
Meagher-Hilger complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes2032145914802201lp91wy0411:24000
Meagher-Beeno-Hilger complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes204813114802191lp90wy0411:24000
Weed-Savar-Hilger, very stony complex, 2 to 25 percent slopes7C01335832130ztzwy6171:24000
Pachel-like, stony-Hilger, stony-Zillion, very stony complex, 10 to 50 percent slopes242032090662zdqzwy6291:24000
Pachel-like, stony-Hilger, stony-Zillion, very stony complex, 10 to 50 percent slopes242032533432zdqzwy65620081:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HILGER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .