Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GRIFFY soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GRIFFY, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GRIFFY were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
3240A3446S1954WY013003Griffy6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.0750008,-108.4619446
3240A3447S1954WY013004Griffy6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.1175003,-108.4102783

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GRIFFY soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GRIFFY series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GRIFFY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GRIFFY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GRIFFY share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GRIFFY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GRIFFY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GRIFFY, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. WY-2012-03-23-01 | Fremont County, East Part and Dubois Area - July 1993

    Soils and their landscape positions as they relate to parent material, precipitation zones, and temperature regimes (Soil Survey of Fremont County, East Part and Dubois Area, WY; 1993).

Map Units

Map units containing GRIFFY as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Griffy loamy sandGr1485495581jmphnv62219721:24000
Griffy gravelly loamGs723495582jmpjnv62219721:24000
Uffens-Rairdent complex, 1 to 10 percent slopes71314991521195392wy04319761:24000
Griffy sandy loam, 1 to 10 percent slopes3110432152076537pwy04319761:24000
Griffy clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes322193152077537qwy04319761:24000
Neiberger-Saddle-Griffy complex, 1 to 10 percent slopes521831708812y62ywy6031:24000
Leeko-Griffy complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes220531708762wxmrwy6031:24000
Uffens-Meeteetse-Griffy complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes211232533102z1ybwy6031:24000
Clifsand-like-Griffy complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes226932533112ztjfwy6031:24000
Snydersditch-like-Griffy complex, 1 to 3 percent slopesB11332533672ztk5wy6031:24000
Griffy-Preatorson complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes235932533752zyb7wy6031:24000
Fruita-like-Griffy complex, 6 to 35 percent slopesS402335663730z7zwy6031:24000
Griffy-Montrose-like, 6 to 15 percent slopesB302336723730dkpwy6031:24000
Griffy-Wall complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes220124216692vz1kwy6031:24000
Emblem-Griffy-Preatorson complex, 1 to 30 percent slopes -- Draft493BD1014815223853dxwy6031:24000
Griffy sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes -- Draft93A124615227853g6wy6031:24000
Griffy sandy loam, 0 to 10 percent slopes -- Draft93AC78115227953g7wy6031:24000
Griffy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesGrA955615736458r8wy61319691:20000
Griffy loam, 3 to 6 percent slopesGrB430515736558r9wy61319691:20000
Griffy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopesGrC62015736658rbwy61319691:20000
Griffy sandy loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes19021788502278jvnjwy62519851:24000
Griffy-Emblem fine sandy loams, 0 to 6 percent slopes1919048502279jvnkwy62519851:24000
Saddle-Griffy association, rolling2707248502406jvsnwy62519851:24000
Griffy-Preatorson complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes313A15251253prwy6291:24000
Griffy-Preatorson complex, 3 to 6 percent slopes313B15251453ptwy6291:24000
Griffy sandy clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes413A15255553r4wy6291:24000
Uffens-Meeteetse-Griffy complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes211231709032z1ybwy6291:24000
Griffy-Montrose-like complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes211929690502wxl5wy6291:24000
Griffy-Clifsand-like complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes212029690532wxl8wy6291:24000
Griffy-Mesa complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes212129690542wxl9wy6291:24000
Griffy-Wall complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes220129614332vz1kwy6291:24000
Leeko-Griffy complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes220529690982wxmrwy6291:24000
Griffy sandy clay loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes221829118892w7hxwy6291:24000
Griffy-Preatorson complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes235932532582zyb7wy6291:24000
Neiberger-Saddle-Griffy complex, 1 to 10 percent slopes521829691172y62ywy6291:24000
Griffy-Bributte-Oceanet-like complex, 4 to 30 percent slopes534031958372z9h1wy6291:24000
Turnback-Braf-Griffy complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes549531710022z212wy6291:24000
Preatorson-Griffy complex, 6 to 50 percent slopes583232532812ztjwwy6291:24000
Clifsand-like-Griffy complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes226932532682ztjfwy6291:24000
Emblem-Griffy complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes -- Draft15AC91515246753n9wy6291:24000
Griffy-Saddle-Wallson complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes0035082215742058t2wy6471:24000
Saddle-Griffy sandy loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes0653980415757658z3wy6471:24000
Griffy-Saddle-Sweatlodge complex, 0 to 20 percent slopes066943515757558z2wy6471:24000
Griffy-Saddle-Wallson association, undulating154104483503019jwffwy71319861:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GRIFFY soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .