Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GALLOWAY soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GALLOWAY, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GALLOWAY were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
153D95P031494NJ001001Galloway5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.5341682,-74.5713882

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GALLOWAY soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GALLOWAY series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GALLOWAY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GALLOWAY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GALLOWAY share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GALLOWAY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GALLOWAY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GALLOWAY, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MD-2010-09-10-09 | Somerset County -

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Parsonsburg Sand Formation (Soil Survey of Somerset County, Maryland).

  2. MD-2010-09-10-12 | Wicomico County -

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in general soil map units 1 and 4 (Soil Survey of Wicomico County, Maryland).

  3. NJ-2010-09-13-02 | Cumberland County -

    Typical relationship of the soils, landform position, and parent material of soils that formed in sandy materials and organic deposits. The excessively drained Evesboro and Lakewood soils are in the higher landform positions. The very poorly drained Berryland, Mullica, and Manahawkin soils are in the lowest landform positions. The moderately well drained Galloway and Lakehurst soils are in the intermediate landform positions, but higher than the poorly drained Atsion soils (Soil Survey of Cumberland County, New Jersey).

  4. NJ-2012-02-14-02 | Cape May County - 2002

    The relationship of soils, landform position, and underlying material in the Hammonton general soil map unit. Galloway soils are a minor component in sandy areas. The Berryland and Mullica-Manahawkin general soil map unit occurs in the adjacent lower areas (Soil Survey of Cape May County, New Jerser; 2002).

Map Units

Map units containing GALLOWAY as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Klej-Galloway complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesKgB21616060831qx84de00120061:24000
Klej-Galloway complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesKgB432616034361qthrde00520061:24000
Klej-Galloway complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesKgB195324526762nb6lmd01120091:12000
Klej-Galloway complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesKgB56411289504b5pmd01919921:15840
Klej-Galloway complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesKgB85014079691j83cmd03920061:12000
Klej-Galloway complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesKgB31117125901vh2vmd04120091:12000
Klej-Galloway complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesKgB1535797557311r53md04520051:12000
Galloway loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopesGamB24190745839t13bnj00119751:24000
Galloway loamy sand, clayey substratum, 0 to 5 percent slopesGamkB4726745840t13cnj00119751:24000
Galloway fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopesGakB4523697744rf1wnj00519671:24000
Galloway sand, 0 to 5 percent slopesGahB3487697742rf1tnj00519671:24000
Galloway sand, loamy substratum, 0 to 5 percent slopesGahhB614697743rf1vnj00519671:24000
Galloway loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopesGamB79697745rf1xnj00519671:24000
Woodstown and Galloway loamy sands, 0 to 5 percent slopesWOUB2892712355rx86nj00719641:12000
Galloway loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopesGamB488710867rvq6nj00719641:12000
Woodstown and Galloway loamy sands, clayey substrata, 0 to 5 percent slopesWOUKB454712356rx87nj00719641:12000
Galloway loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopesGamB2145745568t0tlnj00919971:24000
Galloway loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopesGamB50611358354kbsnj01120031:24000
Galloway variant soils, 0 to 5 percent slopesGASB14241351544jmtnj02119691:24000
Galloway loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopesGamB33481353774jw0nj02319851:24000
Galloway loamy sand, clayey substratum, 0 to 5 percent slopesGamkB26111353784jw1nj02319851:24000
Galloway, clayey substratum-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesGaokB15881353794jw2nj02319851:24000
Galloway loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopesGamB5766697528rdtxnj02919781:24000
Galloway loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopesGamB5011356024k38nj03320041:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GALLOWAY soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .