Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the FREELAND soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of FREELAND, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to FREELAND were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
133A40A4973S1955TN077006Freeland5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.6002769,-88.2733307
133A40A4974S1957TN077012Freeland4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.7677765,-88.3933334

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the FREELAND soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the FREELAND series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FREELAND series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FREELAND series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with FREELAND share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FREELAND series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FREELAND series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with FREELAND, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MS-2012-04-27-05 | Tippah County - February 1966

    Distribution and pattern of major soils in Mantachie-Bibb association (Soil Survey of Tippah County, Mississippi; February 1966).

  2. MS-2012-04-27-07 | Tippah County - February 1966

    Distribution and pattern of major soils in Falaya-Urbo-Waverly association (Soil Survey of Tippah County, Mississippi; February 1966).

  3. TN-2012-03-19-03 | Hardin County - June 1963

    Major soil series in associations 2 and 5 of their relation to the landscape (Soil Survey of Hardin County, TN; 1963).

Map Units

Map units containing FREELAND as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Freeland silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded (providence)FrB22612331844c49nms01319631:15840
Freeland silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, severely eroded (providence)FrB31377331845c49pms01319631:15840
Freeland silt loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, severely eroded (providence)FrC31142331846c49qms01319631:15840
Hatchie and Freeland silt loams, 2 to 5 percent slopes (bude and providence)HfB1823568172m274ms08519611:20000
Hatchie and Freeland silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes (bude and providence)HfA1695568171m273ms08519611:20000
Hatchie and Freeland silt loams, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded (bude and providence)HfB2715568173m275ms08519611:20000
Freeland silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded (providence)FrB2491334193c6rfms13919631:15840
Freeland silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, severely erodedFrB32322327214bzh9tn02319891:24000
Freeland silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, erodedFrB21393327213bzh8tn02319891:24000
Freeland silt loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, severely erodedFrC3867327215bzhbtn02319891:24000
FREELAND SILT LOAM, ERODED UNDULATING PHASEFb3074327307bzl9tn03920081:24000
FREELAND SILT LOAM, ERODED ROLLING PHASEFa957327306bzl8tn03920081:24000
FREELAND SILT LOAM, UNDULATING PHASEFd779327309bzlctn03920081:24000
FREELAND SILT LOAM, ROLLING PHASEFc337327308bzlbtn03920081:24000
FREELAND AND PADEN SOILS, AND ROUGH GULLIED LANDRe78327347bzmltn03920081:24000
Freeland loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, erodedFrB21800327567bzvptn07119611:15840
Freeland loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, severely erodedFrC3951327570bzvstn07119611:15840
Freeland loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, severely erodedFrB3678327568bzvqtn07119611:15840
Freeland loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, erodedFrC2262327569bzvrtn07119611:15840
Freeland silt loam, eroded gently sloping phaseFe5134327737c015tn07719551:20000
Freeland silt loam, severely eroded sloping phaseFh3493327740c018tn07719551:20000
Freeland silt loam, eroded sloping phaseFg1922327739c017tn07719551:20000
Freeland silt loam, severely eroded strongly sloping phaseFk503327741c019tn07719551:20000
Freeland silt loam severely eroded gently sloping phaseFf458327738c016tn07719551:20000
Freeland fine sandy clay loam, severely eroded sloping phaseFb203327734c012tn07719551:20000
Freeland fine sandy loam, eroded gently sloping phaseFc190327735c013tn07719551:20000
Freeland fine sandy clay loam, severely eroded sloping phaseFd96327736c014tn07719551:20000
Freeland fine sandy loam, eroded gently sloping phaseFa24327733c011tn07719551:20000
Freeland silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopesFrB7088327957c088tn10919941:20000
Freeland silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes, severely erodedFrB34727327958c089tn10919941:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the FREELAND soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .