Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the FORELEFT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of FORELEFT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to FORELEFT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the FORELEFT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the FORELEFT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FORELEFT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FORELEFT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with FORELEFT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the FORELEFT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the FORELEFT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with FORELEFT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing FORELEFT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Foreleft loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes85C24173437212xrrvmt01719951:24000
Foreleft-Gerdrum complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes53C13783606382xrrwmt03320021:24000
Foreleft-Bonfri loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes28223613877621hl2jmt64319671:20000
Foreleft loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes2816113877611hl2hmt64319671:20000
Foreleft-Gerdrum complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes86147253481212xrrwmt64919851:24000
Foreleft loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes85119813481202xrrvmt64919851:24000
Kobarter-like-Skelridge-like-Foreleft complex, 5 to 60 percent slopes5D23335669530zs9wy04319761:24000
Geohrock-Foreleft complex, 5 to 30 percent slopesO40131709292z1yxwy6031:24000
Coyoteflats-Foreleft complex, 10 to 25 percent slopesB40831709282wxmlwy6031:24000
Bonfri-Foreleft-Geohrock complex, 6 to 35 percent slopesS40131709272z1ywwy6031:24000
Foreleft-Cooers-Hawksell complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes231033583022wxlpwy6171:24000
Foreleft loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes2B17335835431jy2wy6171:24000
Evanston-like-Foreleft complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes2B18335835531jy3wy6171:24000
Foreleft-Joegale-Potrio complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes4C04335836131jy9wy6171:24000
Hawksell-like-Foreleft complex, 1 to 9 percent slopes2B0131970402zb07wy6171:24000
Foreleft-Mec-like complex, 6 to 25 percent slopes5C08335824030zs3wy6171:24000
Kobarter-like-Skelridge-like-Foreleft complex, 5 to 60 percent slopes5D23335824530zs9wy6171:24000
Delpoint, stony-Foreleft-Sonnett-like complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes5D36335664930z8cwy6171:24000
Foreleft-Cooers-Hawksell complex, 20 to 30 percent slopes240733582842wxmkwy6171:24000
Foreleft-Colstrip-like-Coyoteflats complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes548332030322zbqpwy6291:24000
Cabbart, bouldery-Rock outcrop-Foreleft complex, 25 to 70 percent slopes555532066702zc5wwy6291:24000
Foreleft-Potrio-like-Tymosling complex, 6 to 25 percent slopes580231709832z20gwy6291:24000
Geohrock, very stony-Bronec-Foreleft complex, 6 to 55 percent slopes580432066712zc5xwy6291:24000
Mantlemine-like-Julin-like-Foreleft complex, 4 to 40 percent slopes580532066722zc5ywy6291:24000
Bronec, stony-Foreleft complex, 6 to 30 percent slopes941329119122w7jlwy6291:24000
Bronec, very stony-Foreleft-Amalia-like complex, 8 to 40 percent slopes942431709572z1zmwy6291:24000
Savar-Foreleft complex, 4 to 30 percent slopes942832066862zc6dwy6291:24000
Foreleft-Archin-Kremlin-like complex, 4 to 25 percent slopes943131710062zt95wy6291:24000
Foreleft-Amalia-like, very bouldery complex, 6 to 60 percent slopes943332066762zc62wy6291:24000
Bronec-Foreleft-Armells-like complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes, very bouldery943432066882zc6gwy6291:24000
Spudbar-like, very stony-Mantlemine-like, stony-Foreleft, stony complex, 6 to 40 percent slopes943632504442zv60wy6291:24000
Geohrock, very stony-Foreleft-Zillman complex, 4 to 30 percent slopes944131709952z20vwy6291:24000
Foreleft-Bronec, very stony-Geohrock, stony complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes950231709532z1zhwy6291:24000
Macmeal, very stony-Foreleft complex, 6 to 30 percent slopes543929119142w7jnwy6291:24000
Hawksell-like-Foreleft complex, 1 to 9 percent slopes2B0132532902zb07wy6291:24000
Coyoteflats-Foreleft-Yamacall complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes32524834482pc77wy6291:24000
Rangecreek-like-Bonfri-Foreleft complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes72224835902pcctwy6291:24000
Archin-Foreleft complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes, frequently flooded122131709782z209wy6291:24000
Delpoint-like-Foreleft-Yamacall complex, 6 to 30 percent slopes, occasionally flooded140129119112w7jkwy6291:24000
Foreleft-Evanston-Yamacall complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes220931368532ypnpwy6291:24000
Foreleft-Cooers-Hawksell complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes231029690682wxlpwy6291:24000
Foreleft-Spang-Whistlecreek-like, frequently flooded complex, 0 to 20 percent slopes231129690882wxmfwy6291:24000
Ferball-Foreleft complex, 8 to 20 percent slopes232032030462zbr5wy6291:24000
Foreleft loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes233632504312zv5lwy6291:24000
Foreleft-Cooers-Hawksell complex, 20 to 30 percent slopes240729690922wxmkwy6291:24000
Coyoteflats-Foreleft complex, 10 to 25 percent slopes240829690932wxmlwy6291:24000
Zillman, very bouldery-Foreleft complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes242231709712z202wy6291:24000
Foreleft-Hawksell complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes250732030552zbrkwy6291:24000
Scotty-Broback-Foreleft complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes250832066952zc6pwy6291:24000
Foreleft-Ivanell-like-Niler complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes520929690752wxlxwy6291:24000
Delpoint-Galbreth-like-Foreleft complex, 4 to 25 percent slopes531129690692wxlqwy6291:24000
Coyoteflats-like-Foreleft-Rangecreek complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes535032030712zbs2wy6291:24000
Raghigh-Foreleft family, complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes5343796025547222rc00wy6351:24000
Scotty-Broback-Foreleft complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes250832505452zc6pwy65620081:24000
Cabbart, bouldery-Rock outcrop-Foreleft complex, 25 to 70 percent slopes555532505302zc5wwy65620081:24000
Spudbar-like, very stony-Mantlemine-like, stony-Foreleft, stony complex, 6 to 40 percent slopes943632505352zv60wy65620081:24000
Foreleft-Bronec, very stony-Geohrock, stony complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes950232505392z1zhwy65620081:24000
Foreleft-Bonfri loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes2827065817524wfprwy70520031:24000
Foreleft loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes281721817519wfplwy70520031:24000
Bronec-Foreleft complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes975257515292111nb8dwy71920131:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the FORELEFT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .