Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ERIE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ERIE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ERIE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
14063PA1170081963PA117008Erie4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.7822222,-77.14
14063PA1170091963PA117009Erie4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.8091667,-77.0083333
14068PA0150131968PA015013Erie5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.8352778,-76.2938889
14040A0252S1959NY109013Erie3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.3741684,-76.4416656
14011N0152S2009NY123041Erie6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.5876389,-77.19825

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ERIE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ERIE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ERIE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ERIE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ERIE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ERIE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ERIE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ERIE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NY-2010-09-28-02 | Cattarugus County - 2007

    Representative landscape showing the relationship of some important soils and their parent material. The exaggerated schematics represent some typical soil profiles (Soil Survey of Cattarugus County, New York; 2007).

  2. NY-2012-02-15-06 | Cayuga County - 1971

    Typical cross section of Langford-Erie association and Langford-Howard association in the southeastern part of the county (Soil Survey of Cayuga County, New York; 1971).

  3. NY-2012-02-15-11 | Chautauqua County - August 1994

    Representative landscape showing the relationship of some important soils and their parent material. The exaggerated schematics represent some typical soil profiles (Soil Survey of Chautauqua County, New York; August 1994).

  4. NY-2012-02-15-43 | Seneca County - April 1972

    Cross section of Langford-Erie and Conesus-Lansing associations in southern part of Seneca County (Soil Survey of Seneca County, New York; April 1972).

  5. NY-2012-02-15-48 | Tompkins County - July 1965

    Typical cross section of southern Tompkins County soils, consisting mainly of low-lime and very low-lime soils with a fragipan (Soil Survey of Tompkins County, New York; July 1965).

Map Units

Map units containing ERIE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Erie channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes69C20082999592wn36ny00320131:24000
Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes69B17042999582wn35ny00320131:24000
Erie channery silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes69A1362999572wn34ny00320131:24000
Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes69B74042896812wn35ny00920021:24000
Erie channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes69C24092896822wn36ny00920021:24000
Erie channery silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes69A9382896802wn34ny00920021:24000
Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesErB68102893982wn35ny01119681:15840
Erie channery silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesErA34932893972wn34ny01119681:15840
Erie channery silt loam, moderately shallow variant, 3 to 8 percent slopesEsB5192894009q4hny01119681:15840
Erie channery silt loam, moderately shallow variant, 0 to 3 percent slopesEsA1762893999q4gny01119681:15840
Erie silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesErB117522898252wn3jny01319881:15840
Erie silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesErA17772898242wn3fny01319881:15840
Erie silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesErC10602898262wn3lny01319881:15840
Erie silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes69B299727230622wn3gny02320141:12000
Erie silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes69C204027230632wn3kny02320141:12000
Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesErB84372908042wn35ny02919791:15840
Erie channery silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesErA43882908032wn34ny02919791:15840
Erie channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesErC6632908052wn36ny02919791:15840
Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes69B655231003712wn35ny05120191:24000
Erie channery silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes69A206231003732wn34ny05120191:24000
Erie channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes69C172231003742wn36ny05120191:24000
Langford-Erie channery silt loams, 3 to 8 percent slopes64B102825042652wn37ny06920121:12000
Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes69B46624824562wn35ny06920121:12000
Erie channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes69C37424824552wn36ny06920121:12000
Erie channery silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes69A11324824572wn34ny06920121:12000
Erie gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesErB227522939209vv9ny07119761:15840
Erie extremely stony soils, gently slopingESB176952939219vvbny07119761:15840
Erie gravelly silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesErA106432939199vv8ny07119761:15840
Volusia, Morris, and Erie soils, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very stonyVmC146822945662srfsny09519651:15840
Burdett and Erie channery silt loams, 3 to 8 percent slopesBrB64802944559wdkny09519651:15840
Burdett and Erie channery silt loams, 8 to 15 percent slopesBrC18922944569wdlny09519651:15840
Erie silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesErB84152946072wn3hny09719761:15840
Erie silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesErA19422946062wn3dny09719761:15840
Erie silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesErC7772946082wn3kny09719761:15840
Erie channery silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesErA19422947182wn34ny09919661:15840
Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesErB16562947192wn35ny09919661:15840
Erie channery silt loam, moderately shallow variant, 3 to 8 percent slopesEsB2312947219wp4ny09919661:15840
Erie channery silt loam, moderately shallow variant, 0 to 3 percent slopesEsA1532947209wp3ny09919661:15840
Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesEbB215552955982wn35ny10919631:20000
Erie-Chippewa channery silt loams, 0 to 3 percent slopesErA61112956042vcj8ny10919631:20000
Erie channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesEbC29192956002wn36ny10919631:20000
Volusia and Erie soils, 15 to 25 percent slopesVrD12772956882v32lny10919631:20000
Erie channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, erodedEbC38132956012wn3cny10919631:20000
Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, erodedEbB32462955992wn3bny10919631:20000
Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesEsB225062953492wn35ny12119691:20000
Erie silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesErA114412953482wn3dny12119691:20000
Erie channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesEsC18022953502wn36ny12119691:20000
Langford-Erie channery silt loams, 3 to 8 percent slopes64B1072214078092wn37ny12319481:12000
Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes69B355314077682wn35ny12319481:12000
Erie channery silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes69A152514077672wn34ny12319481:12000
Erie channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes69C11114077692wn36ny12319481:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ERIE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .