Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the DOGTOOTH soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of DOGTOOTH, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to DOGTOOTH were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
5485ND04120385ND041203Dogtooth2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.3694444,-102.5244444
n/a92P015791ND085170Dogtooth8Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the DOGTOOTH soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the DOGTOOTH series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the DOGTOOTH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the DOGTOOTH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with DOGTOOTH share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the DOGTOOTH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the DOGTOOTH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with DOGTOOTH, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. ND-2010-09-27-03 | Billings County - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Janesburg-Dogtooth association (Soil Survey of Billings County, North Dakota; 2005).

Map Units

Map units containing DOGTOOTH as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Cabba complex, 6 to 35 percent slopesE0701F44629921771vzrymt10919561:31680
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Cabba complex, 6 to 35 percent slopesE0701F9927556381vzrynd00119831:20000
Janesburg-Dogtooth complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0563B4597026990392r4gjnd00719981:24000
Dogtooth-Janesburg complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0559B1813826990382r4ghnd00719981:24000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Cabba complex, 6 to 35 percent slopesE0701F1269317151701vzrynd00719981:24000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Brandenburg complex, 9 to 35 percent slopesE3021F584727070991vzvbnd00719981:24000
Dogtooth-Janesburg complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesE0561D182717151611vzrhnd00719981:24000
Cedarpan-Dogtooth, barren, very stony-Farfeld complex, 3 to 35 percent slopesE6039F8792707119d1v1nd00719981:24000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Cabba complex, 6 to 35 percent slopesE0701F162725635471vzrynd01119691:20000
Regent-Moreau-Dogtooth complex, 3 to 9 percent slopesRlB28899288712b5mnd01119691:20000
Reeder-Dogtooth complex, 6 to 9 percent slopesRdC18499287912b5cnd01119691:20000
Reeder-Dogtooth complex, 3 to 6 percent slopesRdB12799287812b5bnd01119691:20000
Reeder-Dogtooth complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesRdA4299287712b59nd01119691:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Cabba complex, 6 to 35 percent slopesE0701F1317927071801vzrynd02519811:20000
Janesburg-Dogtooth complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0563B118127071712r4gjnd02519811:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0559B45727071702r4ghnd02519811:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesE0561D10727584681vzrhnd02519811:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg silt loams, saline, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0557B517131541vzrdnd02519811:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Brandenburg complex, 9 to 35 percent slopesE3021F227584841vzvbnd02519811:20000
Barkof-Wayden-Dogtooth complex, 3 to 9 percent slopesE0725C444727072752r4gnnd03319851:24000
Brandenburg-Cabba-Dogtooth complex, 15 to 70 percent slopesE3013F182759747cdtsnd03319851:24000
Janesburg-Dogtooth complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0563B627597302r4gjnd03319851:24000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Cabba complex, 6 to 35 percent slopesE0701F50827596341vzrynd03719851:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Cabba complex, 6 to 35 percent slopesE0701F9427556751vzrynd04119861:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Cabba complex, 6 to 35 percent slopesE0701F6259127150391vzrynd05320031:24000
Brandenburg-Cabba-Dogtooth complex, 15 to 70 percent slopesE3013F357742715087cdtsnd05320031:24000
Dogtooth-Janesburg complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0559B1843627150332r4ghnd05320031:24000
Brandenburg-Searing-Dogtooth complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesE3013D87382715086cdtrnd05320031:24000
Janesburg-Dogtooth complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0563B492127150342r4gjnd05320031:24000
Dogtooth-Janesburg complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesE0561D10927597111vzrhnd05320031:24000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Werner complex, 3 to 25 percent slopesC593E625671572q6mdnd05519741:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Cabba complex, 6 to 35 percent slopesE0701F174626992531vzrynd05719761:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Cabba complex, 6 to 35 percent slopesE0701F3984717183341vzrynd05919981:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0559B1370617183282r4ghnd05919981:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Cabba complex, 6 to 35 percent slopesE0701F536526625121vzrynd06119881:24000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Werner complex, 3 to 25 percent slopesC593E252025667752q6mdnd06119881:24000
Dogtooth-Janesburg complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesE0561D1426625101vzrhnd06119881:24000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Cabba complex, 6 to 35 percent slopesE0701F3327557041vzrynd06519711:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0559B3227557032r4ghnd06519711:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Regent complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesE0705D217372699080d1x3nd08519921:24000
Janesburg-Dogtooth complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0563B1689526990972r4gjnd08519921:24000
Janesburg-Dogtooth fine sandy loams, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0569B112842699096d1xjnd08519921:24000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Cabba complex, 6 to 35 percent slopesE0701F746026990791vzrynd08519921:24000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Cabba complex, 6 to 35 percent slopesE0701F60727585081vzrynd08719741:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0559B9827073662r4ghnd08719741:20000
Janesburg-Dogtooth complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0563B1682327159702r4gjnd08919651:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0559B1344727159692r4ghnd08919651:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Cabba complex, 6 to 35 percent slopesE0701F721527159761vzrynd08919651:20000
Brandenburg-Dogtooth-Janesburg complex, 0 to 15 percent slopesE3015D77527159971vzv9nd08919651:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Brandenburg complex, 9 to 35 percent slopesE3021F68817135461vzvbnd08919651:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesE0561D58617134581vzrhnd08919651:20000
Amor-Dogtooth-Janesburg loams, 3 to 25 percent slopes, very stonyE0711E37527159771vzrznd08919651:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg silt loams, saline, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0557B20617134551vzrdnd08919651:20000
Dogtooth-Janesburg-Cabba complex, 6 to 35 percent slopesDcE727329331331vzrysd03119861:24000
Dogtooth-Janesburg complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesDjD82529208181vzrhsd03119861:24000
Dogtooth-Janesburg complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesDjD19729208201vzrhsd06319841:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the DOGTOOTH soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .