Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the DIXBORO soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of DIXBORO, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to DIXBORO were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
99SN-0171980-OH143-017Dixboro3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.2698288,-83.1726532

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the DIXBORO soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the DIXBORO series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the DIXBORO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the DIXBORO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with DIXBORO share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the DIXBORO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the DIXBORO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with DIXBORO, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing DIXBORO as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Dixboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesDxA11267365668llmi03719741:15840
Dixboro loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopesDxA924200482m782mi04919671:20000
Dixboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesDxA624018701068llmi05719751:12000
Dixboro very fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes43A87141887726bffmi07519791:15840
Dixboro loamy fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes84B227218721268t3mi08119841:15840
Dixboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesDtA1725087345ny4mi09119571:20000
Dixboro loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopesDbA18925085216bj2mi09919671:20000
Dixboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes120A25225092095pqmmi11519801:15840
Dixboro-Kibbie fine sandy loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes106A19825091656fd7mi11519801:15840
Dixboro loamy fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes14B9471864426808mi12319901:15840
Dixboro loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes46A27051888546bj2mi12519801:15840
Dixboro loamy very fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes29A9811890166bp9mi12719921:15840
Dixboro-Kibbie fine sandy loams, 0 to 4 percent slopesDoA24671916186fd7mi16119741:20000
Dixboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesDtA17741690785ny4oh05119811:15840
Dixboro-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesDtA60581698385pqnoh09519781:15840
Dixboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesDsA22881698375pqmoh09519781:15840
Dixboro-Kibbie complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesDkA76851695575pfloh14319831:15840
Tedrow-Dixboro complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesTfA46151695865pgjoh14319831:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the DIXBORO soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .