Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the DARNELL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of DARNELL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to DARNELL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
84A73-OK-57-2073-OK113-57-20Darnell2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.7961833,-96.2056861
84A79-OK-60-1179-OK119-60-11Darnell4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.9753528,-96.6211556
84A79-OK-60-1279-OK119-60-12Darnell4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.096,-97.1940889
84A91P087891OK083007Darnell6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.7386093,-97.2797241
84A93P039092OK081001Darnell5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.8549995,-97.109169
84A93KS019001A93KS019001ADarnell2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.0158348,-96.3630524
84A93KS07300193KS073001Darnell2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.7080574,-96.0422211
84A93KS12500293KS125002Darnell2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.25,-95.9463882
84A93KS20500393KS205003Darnell2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.6474991,-95.9422226

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the DARNELL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the DARNELL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the DARNELL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the DARNELL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with DARNELL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the DARNELL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the DARNELL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with DARNELL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. KS-2012-01-20-52 | Elk County - November 1986

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Niotaze-Darnell-Stephenville association (Soil Survey of Elk County, Kansas; 1986).

  2. KS-2012-01-20-53 | Elk County - November 1986

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Steedman-Dennis-Eram association (Soil Survey of Elk County, Kansas; 1986).

  3. KS-2012-01-26-35 | Wilson County - February 1989

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Bates-Collinsville-Dennis association (Soil Survey of Wilson County, Kansas; 1989).

  4. KS-2012-01-26-36 | Wilson County - February 1989

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Steedman-Niotaze-Darnell association (Soil Survey of Wilson County, Kansas; 1989).

  5. OK-2010-09-29-11 | Noble County - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Darnell-Grainola-Newalla-Harrah general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Noble County, Oklahoma; 2005).

  6. OK-2012-02-17-01 | Lincoln County - January 1970

    Typical pattern of soils in associations 1 and 2 (Soil Survey of Lincoln County, Oklahoma; January 1970).

  7. OK-2012-02-17-04 | Logan County - June 1960

    Soils of southeastern Logan County on reddish sandstone, colluvium, and alluvium (Soil Survey of Logan County, Oklahoma; June 1960).

  8. OK-2012-02-17-08 | Love County - September 1966

    Diagram showing typical relief in the northwestern corner of the county and the relative positions of the soils in association 4 (Soil Survey of Love County, Oklahoma; September 1966).

  9. OK-2012-02-17-14 | Oklahoma County - February 1969

    Typical pattern of soils in soil association 1 (Soil Survey of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma; February 1969).

  10. OK-2012-02-17-24 | Pawnee County - March 1959

    Woodland soils of the eastern part of the county formed in sandstone and shale, and in soft, sandy mantle material (Soil Survey of Pawnee County, Oklahoma; March 1959).

  11. OK-2012-02-17-28 | Payne County - April 1987

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Grainola-Masham-Lucien map unit (Soil Survey of Payne County, Oklahoma; April 1987).

  12. OK-2012-02-17-29 | Payne County - April 1987

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Stephenville-Darnell map unit (Soil Survey of Payne County, Oklahoma; April 1987).

  13. OK-2012-02-17-37 | Pontotoc County - April 1973

    Pattern of soils in the Stephenville-Darnell-Windthorst association (Soil Survey of Pontotoc County, Oklahoma; April 1973).

  14. OK-2012-02-17-48 | Stephens County - 1964

    Typical pattern of soils in associations 1 and 5 (Soil Survey of Stephens County, Oklahoma; 1964).

  15. OK-2012-02-17-56 | Washington County - November 1968

    Major soil series in soil associations 4 and 5, and their relation to the landscape (Soil Survey of Washington County, Oklahoma; November 1968).

  16. TX-2010-11-03-41 | Jack County - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Exray-Truce-Bonti general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Jack County, Texas; 2005).

  17. TX-2010-11-03-42 | Jack County - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Shatruce general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Jack County, Texas; 2005).

  18. TX-2010-11-03-45 | Jack County - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Bluegrove-Kamay general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Jack County, Texas; 2005).

  19. TX-2012-03-22-20 | Wise County - May 1989

    Typical pattern of the Truce-Cona general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Wise County, TX; 1989).

Map Units

Map units containing DARNELL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Niotaze-Darnell complex, 6 to 35 percent slopes69513808714533751ksc2ks01919721:24000
Stephenville-Darnell fine sandy loams, 1 to 6 percent slopes69813151714533791ksc6ks01919721:24000
Stephenville-Darnell fine sandy loams, 1 to 6 percent slopes69811295214533151ks94ks04919841:24000
Niotaze-Darnell complex, 6 to 35 percent slopes69511099914533091ks8yks04919841:24000
Niotaze-Darnell complex, 6 to 35 percent slopes6951375614536541ksn2ks07319811:24000
Niotaze-Darnell complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes6950204114536531ksn1ks07319811:24000
Stephenville-Darnell fine sandy loams, 1 to 6 percent slopes69812514536571ksn5ks07319811:24000
Niotaze-Darnell complex, 6 to 35 percent slopes69511007614269121jwtfks12519781:24000
Stephenville-Darnell fine sandy loams, 1 to 6 percent slopes6981897114269141jwthks12519781:24000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes6982619414270042wqg4ks13319801:20000
Niotaze-Darnell complex, 6 to 35 percent slopes6951981014269611jww0ks20519851:20000
Stephenville-Darnell fine sandy loams, 1 to 6 percent slopes6981321914269641jww3ks20519851:20000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes6982176214269652wqg4ks20519851:20000
Darnell-Niotaze complex, 25 to 45 percent slopes6940141314271601jx2fks20719731:20000
Niotaze-Darnell complex, 6 to 35 percent slopes695188814271611jx2gks20719731:20000
Darnell-Noble association, 3 to 12 percent slopesDnD65614381879dtcpok01519671:24000
Darnell-Noble association, 12 to 30 percent slopesDnE17033381880dtcqok01519671:24000
Darnell-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 75 percent slopesRo8911381920dtf0ok01519671:24000
Darnell fine sandy loam, 3 to 12 percent slopes, severely erodedDaD33921381878dtcnok01519671:24000
Darnell-Noble complex, 15 to 30 percent slopesDnF9779381938dtflok01719721:24000
Darnell-Noble complex, 5 to 15 percent slopesDnD6437381937dtfkok01719721:24000
Windthorst-Darnell-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes5494603820402tc3zok01919771:24000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes416911382026dtjfok01919771:24000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 5 to 20 percent slopesSvDF206643334plfqok01919771:24000
Stephenville-Darnell-Newalla complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesSEND611253820822y2rjok02719841:24000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesSvDC137703821332y2rgok02719841:24000
Stephenville-Darnell-Newalla complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes, erodedSEND21189430900662y2rlok02719841:24000
Stephenville-Darnell-Newalla complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes, gulliedSEND4974630900652y2s6ok02719841:24000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes, erodedSvDC230133821032y2rhok02719841:24000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rockyStDD102025152782tq8hok03719521:24000
Stephenville-Darnell-Gullied land complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesSDGD45532210362y2rkok03719521:24000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 5 to 20 percent slopes6921241382604dv42ok04919821:24000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes5220446382674dv6bok05119751:24000
Noble-Darnell complex, 3 to 5 percent slopes329188382652dv5mok05119751:24000
Darnell-Noble complex, 8 to 20 percent slopes53201382671dv67ok05119751:24000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 1 to 12 percent slopesSdE8696383249dvswok06719671:24000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes4450713833092tq2fok06919761:24000
Darnell-Stephenville complex, 3 to 12 percent slopesDaSE1184053835082y2rpok08119661:24000
Darnell-Stephenville complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes, severely erodedDaSE3646923835092y2rrok08119661:24000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 5 to 15 percent slopesSvDE2012930900722y2rwok08319941:12000
Stephenville-Darnell-Newalla complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes, erodedSEND21780430900682y2rlok08319941:12000
Darnell-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 45 percent slopesDaRG147073836092tq8mok08319941:12000
Stephenville-Darnell-Newalla complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesSEND1115630900692y2rjok08319941:12000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesSvDC1115030900702y2rgok08319941:12000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes, erodedSvDC2960330900712y2rhok08319941:12000
Stephenville-Darnell-Gullied land complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesSEGD4745930900672y2rkok08319941:12000
Windthorst-Darnell-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 25 percent slopesWn59343837602tc3zok08519631:24000
Darnell-Stephenville complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes43206383906dwh2ok09519781:24000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rockyStDD50283841152tq8hok10319941:24000
Newalla-Darnell complex, 8 to 45 percent slopes, very boulderyNeDG4151384092dwp2ok10319941:24000
Stephenville-Darnell-Gullied land complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesSEGD42820130900742y2rkok10719961:24000
Darnell-Stephenville complex, 3 to 12 percent slopesDaSE234313841492y2rpok10719961:24000
Darnell-Stephenville complex, 3 to 5 percent slopesDaSC73393841482y2rtok10719961:24000
Stephenville-Darnell-Newalla complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesSEND448230900732y2rjok10719961:24000
Stephenville-Darnell-Newalla complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesSEND5997130900772y2rjok10919961:12000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesSvDC2832030900812y2rgok10919961:12000
Stephenville-Darnell-Newalla complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes, erodedSEND21013530900792y2rlok10919961:12000
Stephenville-Darnell-Gullied land complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesSEGD4817230900762y2rkok10919961:12000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes, erodedSvDC2425330900802y2rhok10919961:12000
Darnelll-Stephenville-Rock outcrop complex, 3 to 45 percent slopesDaSRG93430900752y2rvok10919961:12000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rockyStDD619814129652tq8hok11720071:24000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rockyStDD3236819073822tq8hok11919831:24000
Darnell-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 45 percent slopes1080363845052tq8mok11919831:24000
Darnell-Stephenville complex, 5 to 20 percent slopesDaE46507384610dx6sok12319671:24000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesSvD16917384654dx86ok12319671:24000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes43580463847052tq2fok12519751:24000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes44730333848322tq2fok13319761:24000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes, severely eroded45355533848332tq8gok13319761:24000
Niotaze-Darnell complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes2725188384813dxfbok13319761:24000
Stephenville-Darnell complex, 5 to 12 percent slopesSdE421493848882tq2fok13719601:24000
Newalla-Darnell complex, 5 to 35 percent slopesWn5199384893dxhxok13719601:24000
Darnell extremely stony sandy loam, 5 to 30 percent slopesDaF17501067993l44ok14719651:20000
Darnell-Stephenville complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesDsC4991068003l45ok14719651:20000
Darnell-Exray complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes, stonyDaD6913362423d542tx00919861:24000
Darnell-Truce complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes1013232363861d6mgtx07719771:24000
Exray-Darnell complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes, very stonyEdD73720368036dbz4tx23719921:24000
Darnell-Exray complex, very stony, 5 to 20 percent slop esDaE4104373658djthtx49719841:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the DARNELL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .