Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CREIGHTON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CREIGHTON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CREIGHTON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
6488P066088WY031005Creighton5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.5983315,-104.9008331
6440A2077S1976NE013044Creighton5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.1186104,-103.0013885
67A40A3434S1954WY015004Creighton5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.5980568,-104.460556
67A40A3435S1954WY015005Creighton5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.6005554,-104.5463867
67A40A3106S1964WY015010Creighton6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.7983322,-104.2222214
67A08N0051S2008NE157001Creighton7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.7478065,-103.8224182

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CREIGHTON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CREIGHTON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CREIGHTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CREIGHTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CREIGHTON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CREIGHTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CREIGHTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CREIGHTON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NE-2012-02-13-60 | Morrill County - August 1985

    A generalized cross section of Morrill County that shows the relationship of parent material, soil associations, and elevation (Soil Survey of Morrill County, Nebraska; August 1985).

  2. WY-2012-03-23-05 | Goshen County, Southern Part - November 1971

    Typical pattern of soils, topography, and parent material in association 2 (Soil Survey of Goshen County, Wyoming, Southern Part; 1971).

Map Units

Map units containing CREIGHTON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes5935172616924751tt4zne00719881:20000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes593442816924741tt4yne00719881:20000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes593428431357778d097ne01319801:20000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes593520743357779d098ne01319801:20000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 6 to 11 percent slopes59362511357780d099ne01319801:20000
Creighton-Norrest complex, 6 to 11 percent slopes59382470357781d09bne01319801:20000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes58152327357777d096ne01319801:20000
Creighton-Norrest complex, 11 to 30 percent slopes59371916357782d09cne01319801:20000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes5935277116990201v0z3ne02919801:20000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes5934229016990191v0z2ne02919801:20000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 6 to 11 percent slopes5936173416990211v0z4ne02919801:20000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes5934101516986731v0lxne03319891:20000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes593561516986741v0lyne03319891:20000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes5935466316925981tt8yne12319811:20000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes5935194416989621v0x7ne13519871:20000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes5934100416989611v0x6ne13519871:20000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 6 to 11 percent slopes5936173116537301shv4ne15719651:20000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes5935104116537291shv3ne15719651:20000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes13749531044933hqrwy03119981:24000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes1313616697641t1jcwy60920061:24000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopesCvB72681046793hxrwy61519651:20000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopesCvC34161046803hxswy61519651:20000
Creighton very fine sandy loam, 10 to 20 percent slopesCvD12331046813hxtwy61519651:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CREIGHTON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .