Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the COLDFEET soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of COLDFEET, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to COLDFEET were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the COLDFEET soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the COLDFEET series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the COLDFEET series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the COLDFEET series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with COLDFEET share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the COLDFEET series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the COLDFEET series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with COLDFEET, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing COLDFEET as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Coldfeet gravelly loam, 20 to 60 percent slopes43B71559424084912lv78id65020111:24000
Ezbin-Coldfeet complex, 12 to 30 percent slopes43B72343624084952lv7did65020111:24000
Broad Canyon, very stony surface-Coldfeet family-Mccadden family, very stony surface, complex, 20 to 55 percent slopes1070a393529808562x00lid7131:24000
Coldfeet-Lucky Star complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very stony surface1056383829808422x004id7131:24000
Broad Canyon-Coldfeet complex, 30 to 55 percent slopes, very stony surface1004279928994342w1fnid7131:24000
Coldfeet-Coldfeet, perched water table, families, complex, 8 to 20 percent slopes101559629170352w9rpid7131:24000
Coldfeet gravelly loam, 20 to 60 percent slopes43B71594325185662qf5hid75819981:24000
Ezbin-Coldfeet complex, 12 to 30 percent slopes43B7234825185702qf5mid75819981:24000
Sedimentary Conglomerate Sideslopes (South), Subalpine Fir Complex36403792554695530xwy6351:24000
Sedimentary Moraines, Subalpine Fir Complex33471302554692530lwy6351:24000
Mountain Front Moraines (North), Subalpine Fir Complex43421002515447531gwy6351:24000
Foothill Moraines, Subalpine Fir Complex6342842515450531xwy6351:24000
Sedimentary Conglomerate Sideslopes (North), Subalpine Fir Complex3642262554696530zwy6351:24000
Sedimentary Till-Mantled Sideslopes (North), Subalpine Fir Complex364117375151867530ywy66219981:24000
Mountain Front Moraines (North), Subalpine Fir Complex43429601151883531gwy66219981:24000
Mountain Front Moraines, Subalpine Fir Complex43417931151918532lwy66219981:24000
Sedimentary Moraines, Subalpine Fir Complex33475118151856530lwy66219981:24000
Sedimentary Conglomerate Sideslopes (North), Subalpine Fir Complex36424697151868530zwy66219981:24000
Sedimentary Chugwater Sideslopes (North), Subalpine Fir Complex364345071518695310wy66219981:24000
Mountain Front Till-Mantled Sideslopes (South), Subalpine Fir Complex464544281519325331wy66219981:24000
Mountain Front Colluvial Sideslopes (South), Subalpine Fir Complex464439121519335332wy66219981:24000
Sedimentary Conglomerate Sideslopes (South), Subalpine Fir Complex36403520151866530xwy66219981:24000
Sedimentary Moraines, Subalpine Fir-Willow Complex33443119151854530jwy66219981:24000
Sedimentary Till Plains, Subalpine Fir Complex33432539151853530hwy66219981:24000
Foothill Moraines, Subalpine Fir Complex63421480151897531xwy66219981:24000
Mountain Front Sideslopes, Big Sagebrush-Subalpine Fir Complex46211398151884531hwy66219981:24000
Mountain Front Moraines, Subalpine Fir-Aspen-Big Sagebrush Complex43431106151919532mwy66219981:24000
Dranyon-Badwater-Coldfeet, families, complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes3733126334772r7fywy66219981:24000
Wander-Coldfeet-Badwater families, complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes223156371519645342wy66320121:24000
Enentah-Coldfeet families, complex, 40 to 90 percent slopes34613671152015535qwy66320121:24000
Coldfeet-Needleton families, complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes35312404152016535rwy66320121:24000
Needleton-Coldfeet families, complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes3432867152013535nwy66320121:24000
Como-Enentah-Coldfeet families, complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes3241629152004535cwy66320121:24000
Baird Hollow-Coldfeet-Beaverdam families, complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes41110941520315367wy66320121:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the COLDFEET soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .