Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CHIPETA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CHIPETA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CHIPETA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CHIPETA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CHIPETA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHIPETA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHIPETA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CHIPETA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHIPETA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHIPETA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CHIPETA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. CO-2011-05-31-01 | Rio Blanco Area - 1982

    Typical pattern of soils in general map unit 4 (Soil Survey of Rio Blanco Area, Colorado; 1982).

  2. CO-2012-05-09-06 | Rio Blanco County Area - May 1982

    Typical pattern of soils in general map unit 4 (Soil Survey of Rio Blanco County Area, Colorado; May 1982).

Map Units

Map units containing CHIPETA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Farb-Chipeta family-Rock outcrop complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes343868580192qsyfaz71520071:24000
Chipeta family-Badland-Moncisco complex, 2 to 45 percent slopes223307580172qsycaz71520071:24000
Badland-Deaver-Chipeta complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stonyMC5225403170436k09nco66019941:24000
Persayo-Chipeta complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes7411364502116jvh9co67519861:24000
Chipeta silty clay, 3 to 30 percent slopes2311614496599jnrbco67919761:24000
Badland-Deaver-Chipeta complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stonyMC521603170498k09nco67919761:24000
Badland-Deaver-Chipeta complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stony5228513506746k09nco68019701:31680
Chipeta silty clay loam, 3 to 30 percent slopes211265496681jntzco68219861:24000
Badland-Deaver-Chipeta complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stonyMC526503170520k09nco68219861:24000
Chipeta silty clay loam, 3 to 25 percent slopes1612205496964jp43co68519791:24000
Chipeta-Killpack silty clay loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes1811378496966jp45co68519791:24000
Chipeta-Walknolls complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes196486496967jp46co68519791:24000
Chipeta silty clay loam, 3 to 25 percent slopes, eroded174121496965jp44co68519791:24000
Deaver-Chipeta complex, 3 to 35 percent slopes5526205497232jpdrco68619921:31680
Deaver-Chipeta silty clay loams, 3 to 35 percent slopes1817506220jzrpco69219981:24000
Farb-Chipeta-Rock outcrop complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes11861712572171xjqnm69220011:24000
Chipeta-Badland-Moncisco complex, 2 to 45 percent slopes13011749573271xn8nm69220011:24000
Chipeta-Badland-Moncisco complex, 2 to 45 percent slopes1506413573541xp4nm71719931:24000
Blueflat-Chipeta-Casmos complex, 2 to 25 percent slopesCTD258923984462lhs7ut0131:24000
Hanksville-Chipeta-Badland complex, 2 to 8 percent slopesHhD123023932702lbd8ut0131:24000
Odome-Casmos-Chipeta association, 1 to 10 percent slopesCnD107023722312kmhlut0131:24000
Persayo-Chipeta complex8019572503776jx6vut61619831:24000
Chipeta-Badland complex176211503706jx4lut61619831:24000
Chipeta silty clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes16985503705jx4kut61619831:24000
Chipeta-Persayo complex18456503707jx4mut61619831:24000
Chipeta-Persayo-Killpack complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes03344413504839jyb4ut62320111:24000
Chipeta-Badland complex, 3 to 45 percent slopes03138799504830jy9vut62320111:24000
Persayo-Chipeta association, 3 to 20 percent slopes12721480504918jydput62320111:24000
Hanksville-Chipeta complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes06320829504846jybcut62320111:24000
Chipeta-Killpack-Persayo association, 1 to 3 percent slopes0328996504838jyb3ut62320111:24000
Badland-Chipeta complex, 25 to 80 percent slopes0047287186032220ftdut62320111:24000
Blueflat-Killpack-Chipeta complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes0122526186032020ftbut62320111:24000
Chipeta complex1194664504503jxz9ut62419851:24000
Killpack-Chipeta complex2432395504517jxzrut62419851:24000
Chipeta-Badland complex1230112504504jxzbut62419851:24000
Mesa-Chipeta-Thedalund family complex3129052504525jy00ut62419851:24000
Chipeta silty clay loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes1017806504502jxz8ut62419851:24000
Hostage-Chipeta complex2115043504514jxznut62419851:24000
Hanksville-Chipeta complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes3102175931938792z93jut6251:24000
Chipeta-Badland complex, 3 to 45 percent slopes3104103731938812z93lut6251:24000
Blueflat-Killpack-Chipeta complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes312797319410230njkut6251:24000
Chipeta-Badland complex2552445551511vd2ut63119821:24000
Chipeta silty clay, 2 to 15 percent slopes2341275551491vd0ut63119821:24000
Chipeta gravelly silty clay, 30 to 60 percent slopes2418638551501vd1ut63119821:24000
Hanksville-Chipeta complex3917802551661vdkut63119821:24000
Goblin-Chipeta complex3716958551641vdhut63119821:24000
Moenkopie-Chipeta complex5814360551871vf7ut63119821:24000
Rock outcrop-Chipeta-Canyon family complex8910235552211vgbut63119821:24000
Rock outcrop-Chipeta complex889062552201vg9ut63119821:24000
Cerrillos-Chipeta complex212713551471vcyut63119821:24000
Milok-Chipeta complex511551551801vf0ut63119821:24000
Chipeta variant-Badland-Rock outcrop complex261129551521vd3ut63119821:24000
Chipeta-Hanksville-Badland complex, Tropic Shale, 2 to 30 percent slopes1493723795582kw3yut6421:63360
Chipeta-Rock outcrop association, 35 to 60 percent slopes1071296228839152sp8kut64319761:63000
Chipeta-Hanksville-Huerfano complex, 2 to 35 percent slopes103666428839092sp8but64319761:63000
Badland-Chipeta, moist-Sinbad families complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes9S331486330hlsut6451:24000
Chipeta, saline-sodic-Stent family complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes2029925074312q700ut68519901:24000
Hanksville, saline-sodic-Chipeta, saline complex, 9 to 45 percent slopes3112625044692q3s8ut68519901:24000
Chipeta-Hanksville-Badland, Tropic Shale, complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes515014703598682097ut68620041:24000
Wall-Persayo-Chipeta complex, 4 to 30 percent slopes535132533202zyb2wy6031:24000
Chipeta-Persayo-Rock outcrop complex, 6 to 45 percent slopes -- Draft374CE8801615218653c7wy6031:24000
Chipeta-Deaver-Stutzman complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes -- Draft474AD2146015223153dpwy6031:24000
Persayo-Bributte-Chipeta complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes -- Draft90A173315226753fvwy6031:24000
Persayo-Chipeta-Frisite complex, 4 to 25 percent slopes539031710172zyb5wy6291:24000
Badland-Chipeta complex, 12 to 30 percent slopes590932532802ztjvwy6291:24000
Chipeta clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes -- Draft74A15265853vgwy6291:24000
Deaver-Chipeta-Stutzman complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes -- Draft373BE15253153qcwy6291:24000
Wall-Persayo-Chipeta complex, 4 to 30 percent slopes535131710142zyb2wy6291:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CHIPETA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .