Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CARLINTON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CARLINTON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CARLINTON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
43A78-ID-291111978ID057003Carlinton4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.7715556,-116.43325
43A77-ID-297277ID057005Carlinton4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.7459,-116.6648
43A78-ID-2912578ID057013Carlinton5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.716,-116.4603
43A85P063884ID035001Carlinton6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.3722229,-115.8697205
43A86P088286ID061005Carlinton7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.2858315,-116.6847229
43A09N1151S2009ID057003Carlinton6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.7305,-116.4363611

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CARLINTON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CARLINTON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CARLINTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CARLINTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CARLINTON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CARLINTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CARLINTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CARLINTON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing CARLINTON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Carlinton-Carrico-Kruse complex, 8 to 35 percent slopesCk37581644802pmz2id05720131:24000
Arson-Carlinton complex, 8 to 35 percent slopesAc15494644241pmczid05720131:24000
Arson-Carlinton complex, dry, 8 to 35 percent slopesAc23479644242pmd0id05720131:24000
Carlinton ashy silt loam, 3 to 20 percent slopesCn1j33822501991v24bid05720131:24000
Longpen-Agatha-Carlinton complex, 5 to 35 percent slopesLp22657644757pmxmid05720131:24000
Carlinton-Carlinton, dry complex, 10 to 35 percent slopesCn21411644665pmtnid05720131:24000
Carlinton-Kruse complex, 5 to 20 percent slopesCn3j5302501175v24did05720131:24000
Carlinton-Carlinton, dry complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes33013126629711hn7fid60619761:24000
Carlinton ashy silt loam, dry, 8 to 25 percent slopes3357526629721hn7gid60619761:24000
Carlinton, dry-Taney complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes3365426629731hn7hid60619761:24000
Carlinton-Benewah complex, 8 to 20 percent slopes3032266298220hc8id60619761:24000
Arson-Carlinton complex, dry, 8 to 35 percent slopesAc21412663010pmd0id60819941:24000
Carlinton, dry-Taney complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes1hn7h10127430551hn7hid60819941:24000
Carlinton-Carlinton, dry complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes1hn7f8427430981hn7fid60819941:24000
Carlinton ashy silt loam, dry, 8 to 25 percent slopes1hn7g2127430651hn7gid60819941:24000
Carlinton silt loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes213768796312nvrid61119941:24000
Carlinton-Talmaks complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes231671796332nvtid61119941:24000
Carlinton silt loam, 10 to 20 percent slopes221197796322nvsid61119941:24000
Carlinton ashy silt loam, 3 to 20 percent slopes476820776622v24bid61220031:24000
Carlinton-Seddow complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes494811776627v24hid61220031:24000
Carlinton-Kruse complex, 5 to 20 percent slopes482516776624v24did61220031:24000
Carlinton ashy silt loam, 20 to 30 percent slopes46832776623v24cid61220031:24000
Carlinton-Carlinton, dry complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes330769713898361hn7fid62020131:24000
Carlinton, dry-Taney complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes336369113898381hn7hid62020131:24000
Carlinton ashy silt loam, dry, 8 to 25 percent slopes335330813898371hn7gid62020131:24000
Carlinton-Benewah complex, 8 to 20 percent slopes3032361186180620hc8id62020131:24000
Arson-Carlinton complex, 8 to 35 percent slopesAc1462425117pmczid62020131:24000
Arson-Carlinton complex, dry, 8 to 35 percent slopesAc2412513911pmd0id62020131:24000
Carlinton ashy silt loam, dry, 8 to 25 percent slopes9335118022302252dvqrwa06320121:24000
Carlinton-Carlinton, dry, complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes933033522302242dvqqwa06320121:24000
Carlinton, dry-Taney complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes933620622302262dvqswa06320121:24000
Carlinton ashy silt loam, dry, 8 to 25 percent slopes9335326513802dvqrwa07519751:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CARLINTON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .