Soil Data Explorer - ANDREGG

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ANDREGG soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ANDREGG, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ANDREGG were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ANDREGG soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ANDREGG series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the ANDREGG series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the ANDREGG series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ANDREGG share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the ANDREGG series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ANDREGG series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ANDREGG, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing ANDREGG as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Andregg coarse sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes	103	740	461847	hhl9	ca067	1989	1:24000
Andregg coarse sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes	104	610	461848	hhlb	ca067	1989	1:24000
Andregg-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes	105	560	461849	hhlc	ca067	1989	1:24000
Andregg-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes	106	210	461850	hhld	ca067	1989	1:24000
Andregg coarse sandy loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes	106	19100	460270	hfyf	ca620	1975	1:24000
Caperton-Andregg coarse sandy loams, 2 to 15 percent slopes	130	6375	460294	hfz6	ca620	1975	1:24000
Andregg coarse sandy loam, rocky, 2 to 15 percent slopes	109	5300	460273	hfyj	ca620	1975	1:24000
Andregg coarse sandy loam, 9 to 15 percent slopes	107	2650	460271	hfyg	ca620	1975	1:24000
Andregg-Shenandoah complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes	113	2400	460277	hfyn	ca620	1975	1:24000
Andregg-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes	112	2025	460276	hfym	ca620	1975	1:24000
Andregg coarse sandy loam, rocky, 30 to 50 percent slopes	111	1800	460275	hfyl	ca620	1975	1:24000
Caperton-Andregg coarse sandy loams, 15 to 30 percent slopes	131	1770	460295	hfz7	ca620	1975	1:24000
Andregg coarse sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes	108	1175	460272	hfyh	ca620	1975	1:24000
Andregg coarse sandy loam, rocky, 15 to 30 percent slopes	110	1150	460274	hfyk	ca620	1975	1:24000
Andregg-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes	105sa	560	1420720	hhlc	ca620	1975	1:24000
Andregg-Fryespoint-Shepherdsaddle complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes	6141	3618	3231071	2wcjt	ca660	1977	1:24000
Cieneba-Andregg complex, 30 to 75 percent slopes	127	10470	457230	hbsc	ca665	1977	1:24000
Andregg-Fryespoint-Shepherdsaddle complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes	6141	7342	2924646	2wcjt	ca792	2018	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ANDREGG soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).